Posted on 02/21/2022 1:56:02 PM PST by ransomnote
silverleaf wrote: ““Peer review” has become just as corrupted as most other tools of the medical establishment. Pretty much been downhill since Lancet published the “ peer reviewed” article discrediting HCQ…then had to withdraw it because it was so shoddy. Despite which the article is still cited”
Sounds like the peer review process worked.
BTW, HCQ does not treat covid.
It is NOT a newsite, but rather a place where people like Alex Berenson, Emerald, and others (Naomi Wolf!) can post long-form essays with virtually no restrictions.
LilFarmer wrote: “So peer review it yourself right here on FR and tell us what is wrong with it. Or do you need someone else to tell you what to think?”
Do you have the expertise to know if they’re accurate or do you want to unquestioningly accept what they have to say because their words fit your preferred narrative?
Please don’t use it, then.
Stick with remdesivir
Not about me, it’s about you. If you don’t like the article tell us why. You seem to be the “resident expert” in all things vax related.
I do have a background sufficient to read and understand research as well as know when a study is well crafted and statistically sound.
LilFarmer wrote: “Not about me, it’s about you. If you don’t like the article tell us why. You seem to be the “resident expert” in all things vax related.”
IMHO, when the authors refuse to submit their analysis to a rigorous scientific review, they have something to hide.
My point being....that substack articles are not merely some off-brand blogsite that only takes rejects.....in case you missed that assertion, upthread.
As far as ‘NOT a newsite’.....I do gather much of the important news of the day, from the articles I read on substack....so, there is that.
Resident expert on all things $hot related???
Thanks....I needed a good laugh, this morning. More like the resident $hift working $hot $hill. That makes one an expert, alright.....on all things FRAUDci and CDC.
Yes, lol, I forgot thr sarc tag! Cracks me up because, he will criticize any and every article, for whatever reason, offering leftist fact-checks as some kind of authority.
“IMHO, when the authors refuse to submit their analysis to a rigorous scientific review, they have something to hide.”
Except for Pfizer and thr CDC, of course, right?
LilFarmer wrote: “Except for Pfizer and thr CDC, of course, right?”
I see you agree that studies and analysis should be subjected to expert review.
That said, the two are not really the same. The Pfizer data includes proprietary and Personally Identifiable Data which requires extensive review prior to release. According to law, some of this data will not be released for many years. This analysis contains neither. The courts have given Pfizer deadlines for releasing the data.
BTTT.
I was around for the swine flu vax debacle in the 70s.
My, how times have changed.
“ It is NOT a newsite, but rather a place where people like Alex Berenson, Emerald, and others (Naomi Wolf!) can post long-form essays with virtually no restrictions.”
————————————————————————————————————————-
Yep, correct.
It’s just a Blog hosting website.
Mostly filled with real Social Media losers.
“ I was around for the swine flu vax debacle in the 70s.
My, how times have changed.”
————————————————————————————————-
Good morning.
Yes, times have indeed changed.
So has technology, perhaps even more.
CDC Says Some People Should Wait Longer for Second COVID-19 Shot Due to Heart Inflammation Risk
Now they tell us.
You have to go a few paragraphs to get to the cardiac risk bit.
ABC, you make Linda Blair look like a piker.
That all cause mortality data must be truly horrific...
Aiming to reduce myocarditis cases, CDC says it's OK to wait 8 weeks between COVID shots
Note that the m-word isn't mentioned until a few bullet points and paragraphs into the article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.