Posted on 01/17/2022 11:09:28 AM PST by Grandpa Drudge
“Obama defunded US hyperviralization. “
He actually didn’t. He went along with the effort to move everything deep into Communist China, the largest mass murder government in human history, so it would be beyond the reach of anyone but them to oversee.
US regulators? Congress? Republican presidents? Investigative reporters, FOIA requests? Flip em the finger because it is in Wuhan. Obama was not protecting us, he was protecting the creeps of the eugenicist Fauci death cult.
Fauxi, Collins and Daz, among others,also, did not want their role in this to be uncovered.
Because President Trump mentioned that right away. Leftists did and said everything that was opposite of Trump. Politics is why.
That the Chicoms knew about the virus, even suppressed movement within Wuhan and to and from Wuhan. Yet they suppressed discussion about it among the Chinese, certainly to the outside world, knowing that tons of Chinese living remotely would some come home for their annual celebration of the Chinese new year, get the virus, and take it with them back to their host countries.
This part's been known for two years and yet we let the Dims distract us in arguing over the virus' origins.
Jack Prosibic is reporting China is having HUGE lock downs because of a hemorrrhagic fever break out!! Just in time for our athletes to go over there and bring the damn thing home!! This country NEEDS TO cut all ties to China ASAP!!
I am with you on this have been from the beginning, THIS WAS DELIBERATE there is not ONE DOUBT in my mind!!
because they are sinful humans like any other group of people.
Being a scientist myself I can testify the group I was around were sinful as any other group of people.
Ironically, the epidemiological data pointing to the origin of the breakout being the Wuhan laboratory was Chinese (Chinese National Health Commission and the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission) before their politicians took a hand. Some of this is cited in Early transmissibility assessment of a novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China by Maimuna S. Majumder, PhD, MPH and Kenneth D. Mandl, MD, MPH of Harvard. This was followed by erroneous and passionate denials that the epicenter of the infection was even in Wuhan, curious in the face of the copious Chinese news reports that the place was a disaster zone by then.
Obviously a very large spoon was stirring this pot, but whose? Certainly the U.S. had no stake in the game since no funding was transferred to China...until it appeared that yes, it was. Antony Fauci didn't know about it, though...until it appeared that yes, he did. But we certainly didn't pay for it...until it appeared that not only we had but Fauci's signature was on it. I have no direct evidence of this other than media reporting, so caveat emptor. Given the incredible expenditure in money and lives that ensued one can certainly understand a reluctance to open up, but the scale of the denial was unprecedented.
There is still no hard public evidence that the virus actually was deliberately constructed, which accounts for a certain reluctance on the part of scientists in the field to point fingers in the face of ferocious institutional resistance, a resistance that itself appears telltale at this point. All of the above is my own speculation, and mine the responsibility for error.
We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag.The report may be downloaded from:
Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.
This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.
I thought we all had to pretend this was an accident, because the only proportionate response to what really happened requires a nuclear response.
It’s good to know that even scientists know how to cover their butts.
That’s the one. Many thanks!
:-)
You are so right.
I posted the whole article, just like you shoulda done. No reason to send freepers to clickbait sites that aren’t on the excerpt list.
Deserves repeating!
Regards,
It wasn’t leaked, it was released.
I wonder if this is why China feared Trump nuking them?
Interesting theory... Like a dude that panics and runs when he sees a cop. Makes you wonder what he thinks maybe got found out, doesn’t it?
I have found that links to the original source document (which my thread provides in the heading) are invariably more complete (including references and links) than simple copies of the text of the article (which your post provides).
The purpose of the "excerpt" is to quickly and briefly identify the important point(s) of the article. That is always my intent in any threads that I initiate. Browsers of FR can then more quickly determine and select threads they wish to review and investigate.
I have found that links to the original source document ... are invariably more complete ...than simple copies of the text of the article
***LINKS are more complete than the ACTUAL article? Do you hear yourself? Plus, by sending freepers to other websites you have them risk cookie downloads, viruses, malware, bad information, and ridiculous levels of advertising. Very inconsiderate.
The purpose of the “excerpt” is to quickly and briefly identify the important point(s) of the article.
***Well first of all, the question posed in the title is one of the MOST important points of the article. Secondly, the purpose of excerpting is not that, it is to avoid copyright issues because FR got sued by LA Times.
That is always my intent in any threads that I initiate.
***You should add to your intent the desire not to be so inconsiderate.
Browsers of FR can then more quickly determine and select threads they wish to review and investigate.
***I think you’re just bein’ lazy. Humble Gunner should give you the blogpimp scolding.
The "excerpt" should be just enough to help determine if the reader is even interested in this post or not, in the long run saving everyone precious time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.