Posted on 01/17/2022 9:05:31 AM PST by ransomnote
“Emergency Use Authorization is illegal if there is an effective therapeutic.”
If repeated often enough it becomes true. Or not.
The left’s whole narrative on prophylactic treatments falls apart withnone simple consideration.
Suppose HCQ and Ivermectin truly don’t do anything to fight Covid? Then what harm is there in letting people decide for themselves if they want to try it or not?
Safe dosage levels are known for both drugs which as commonly used around the world for other conditions.
The *it’s not safe* narrative falls apart because if it truly weren’t safe, then why are they prescribing it in third world countries for dirt cheap and daily or weekly use? If they were not safe medicines, that would be obvious by now.
And hypocritically, Remdesivir is far more toxic and deadly that either HCQ and Ivermectin and not only do they not allow it, they recommend it and mandate it.
I am taking my ivermectin right now due to f’ing fauci flu. I ordered it months ago and highly recommend PushHealth.
Go here and follow through. You can have it at your pharmacy by tonight.
https://www.pushhealth.com/drugs/ivermectin
100% exactly right for me too. Felt relief in hours with ivermectin and I religiously take 10,000 d3, quercetin and zinc daily.
“I can only hope and pray that if the republicans take over Congress after the MidTerms, there will be public hearings about this and the other lies/murders committed over Covid.”
How can I put this nicely? Your a fool for believing the GOP will do any such thing.
Thanks, RN!
.
I don’t think it is useful as a prophylactic, though Ivermectin has shown some promise there.
I didn’t think HCQ and IVM were being pushed as a prophylactic, thought I could be wrong.
They do see in countries where people are taking them in an ongoing state for other things, that the incidence is lower which would indicate a prophylactic component, but that is all I know about it in that respect.
My understanding is that physicians have, for decades, consistently used drugs in an off-label manner, but only when there is absolutely nothing else that is approved for treatment.
I don’t know if it has to be “safe” and how that is determined, or if a physician has to apply to use it in a different way. I admit to being ignorant about that.
What I think is different here is that the government took the off-label use of HCQ and Ivermectin (or at least HCQ) OFF the table by saying it was ONLY approved for use on an inpatient basis under the care of a physician in a controlled study.
That went against decades of physician independence and leeway by removing that capability from them. That is what I have heard. But I know you can still get a physician to prescribe it. So I don’t understand the dynamic, unless I have it wrong.
I have suspected that if you work as a prescribing provider at a large institution, you have to adhere to the treatment algorithms approved by your organization. Deviation from those algorithms can be professionally and legally dangerous to providers, so I have suspected their hands may be tied in this respect.
However, while that provides a consistency in care (following the organizationally approved treatment algorithms) it has resulted in poorer care overall, and physicians, like most people, are herd animals. Nobody likes to be poking out of the crowd in a bad way, which is how deviation from those algorithms might be viewed, unless you are powerful with an independent streak.
But these are all things I have picked up anecdotally.
bkmk
I asked a doc here if HCQ could be prescribed off label for covid and he said sure, he’d done it some himself. So apparently there’s no problem legally which was my question. But in his opinion it just didn’t work and there are now better options. It’s not a dangerous med or anything. A lack of effectiveness appears to be why they aren’t interested in using it.
It was either cooperate with the lockdowns and “science”, OR it was 24/7 wall to wall, that every single death would be meticulously explored on TV and Fauci and Birx explaining how Trump made this happen.
He tried to appease and play along, and then fell for the “two weeks” scam.
He got played on that, but they did have him heavily boxed in.
HCQ was tried as a prophylactic by nursing staffs in Vietnam working on Covid wards. That was a study I ran across at Pubmed when I was looking for HCQ tests. They were hoping it might protect them from infection but they were catching covid at the same rate as when they weren’t using HCQ. It wasn’t for lack of trying.
Yes...I don’t think HCQ works for keeping you from getting , but...if you were taking it, I expect you would still catch it (not gonna stop that) but if you have levels built up or start taking it at the onset of symptoms, I expect you would get a less severe case as it knocks down the viral replication to some degree. There is also the interaction with the other drugs that may impact it as well, like zinc.
People who have been pushing IVM or HCQ usually are proposing a cocktail of things, as far as I know.
“A lack of effectiveness appears to be why they aren’t interested in using it.”
But lack of effectiveness does NOT prevent you from shilling the mRNA gene therapy. Oh what a tangled web you weave when first you practice to deceive.
The thing with HCQ, and most medicines, is that dosage matters. I’ve read about many early studies where they intentionally mis-dosed the patients in an effort to “prove” HCQ and IVM don’t work. Do a “study”, give those in the “study” and ineffective dose or overdose, then declare failure so you can continue in the jab gravy train.
#we’reontoyouandyourtype
In Oklahoma there are numerous doctors that prescribe Ivermectin. I got a prescription when I tested positive on New Years Eve.
Got prescription filled on Monday after NYs.
Local pharmacy will fill. National chain won’t.
Mine was capsules made for my body weight.
Also got infusion that Wed. Feeling good by Saturday.
Thanks. I appreciate your updates on the scamdemic.
IVM is perfectly safe, and is a great preventative and early treatment for Covid-19...84. Crimes have been committed, blocking it. And it is definitely a conspiracy.
Who gains?
Fauci
The vax manufacturers
Democrats
Communists
People who hold lots of stock in vax companies
There are others. Those are the plotters. And there will be proof, if we can ever tget o it. Emails, texts, etc.
Spare me your ignorant blathering. Save it for your conspiracy nut pals. They’ll believe anything same as you.
If HCQ works it’s probably when it’s dealing with low viral loads. The Vietnam nurses were working on Covid wards so were exposed to heavy loads daily.
Zinc interferes with viral replication but needs an ionophore to assist it in crossing cell walls, HCQ being an ionophore. So is quercetin. Ionophore action may not be the only way that HCQ works against the virus. I used to read the studies on that but it’s been awhile. MAbs are the superior therapeutics now and it looks like other drugs are coming out. HCQ and Ivermectin were basically stopgaps when there weren’t a lot of options. They were trying everything.
This conversation is almost unbelievable except that nothing is unbelievable anymore. I remember something about a study which did not get the respect it should have because of a person changing his opinion/ conclusion about it seemingly based on a drug manufacturer’s financial hold on that person. This phone conversation transcript really makes that point. I too do not see how these people can sleep at night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.