Posted on 01/04/2022 4:12:02 PM PST by MtnClimber
“As best I could understand, he had a major hand in the discovery of early RNA technology which ultimately made the vaccines a possibility.”
One necessary discovery among many. An important piece in the puzzle.
“I read awhile back that the scientist who developed the Moderna vaccine gave him some credit in one of her interviews.”
Katalin Kariko. She and Drew Weissman. Their discovery 10 yrs after Malone appears to be the critical one that permitted mRNA vaccines to go forward. Those two aren’t glory hounds, their peers chose them.
Watching this interview and Dr. Peter McCullough — I know 6hrs — will give you a fantastic understanding of all the nuances of the pandemic.
I highly recommend watching to gain excellent knowledge of subject that needs to spread worldwide.
Bkmk
Even scarier, Malone said that Prime Minister Modi of India refused to divulge to the world how they successfully treated COVID-19 after having a meeting with Biden.
-PJ
Evaluation of Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment for Mild to Moderate COVID-19: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial in Eastern India
Results: About one-fourth (23.6%) of the patients in the intervention arm and one-third (31.6%) in the placebo arm were tested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) negative for SARS-CoV-2 on 6th day. Although this difference was found to be statistically insignificant. All patients in the ivermectin group were successfully discharged. In comparison the same for the placebo group was observed to be 93%. This difference was found to be statistically significant.
Conclusions: Inclusion of ivermectin in treatment regimen of mild to moderate COVID-19 patients could not be said with certainty based on our study results as it had shown only marginal benefit in successful discharge from the hospital with no other observed benefits.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34265236/
Steve Bannon’s War Room Pandemic podcast gets one hundred million downloads.
Compare that to the propagandist organs of the commie democrat party media.
Discussion of that study here:
RCT with 112 mild and moderate COVID-19 patients in India, showing lower mortality, ventilation, and ICU admission, although not statistically significant due to the small number of events. There was no mortality in the treatment arm (55 patients) versus 7% (4 of 57) in the control arm. The PCR result is subject to confounding by biased loss of followup, with 23 lost in the treatment group and 13 in the control group, and 8 more people in the treatment group discharged before day 6.
risk of death, 88.7% lower, RR 0.11, p = 0.12, treatment 0 of 55 (0.0%), control 4 of 57 (7.0%), NNT 14, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm).
risk of mechanical ventilation, 79.3% lower, RR 0.21, p = 0.10, treatment 1 of 55 (1.8%), control 5 of 57 (8.8%), NNT 14.
risk of ICU admission, 13.6% lower, RR 0.86, p = 0.80, treatment 5 of 55 (9.1%), control 6 of 57 (10.5%), NNT 70.
risk of no hospital discharge, 88.7% lower, RR 0.11, p = 0.12, treatment 0 of 55 (0.0%), control 4 of 57 (7.0%), NNT 14, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm).
risk of no virological cure, 11.6% higher, RR 1.12, p = 0.35, treatment 42 of 55 (76.4%), control 39 of 57 (68.4%).
Utter Pradesh is the only Indian state that was making claims about Ivermectin. Don’t know what’s going on there now.
My opinion is let people try it if they want. Making it impossible to get Ivermectin and HCQ just enhances their reputation, deserved or not. I suspect that here in the US lawyers are the problem more than the medical types.
Malone said that it's possible that densely populated poor or "emerging economy" countries that historically have used ivermectin to treat parasitic infections might see an improvement in overall health due to the medication treating other things, i.e., by treating a comorbidity it improves the overall health of the patient by reducing complications.
But Malone's larger point was that the discussions need to be had, and not censored. It's the point of medicine to investigate these things, test them according to long-developed processes, and then reach a conclusion that can be peer-reviewed and even independently laboratory confirmed. By censoring divergent opinions right from the start because they conflict with entrenched invested interests, it does more harm than good.
-PJ
We just finished up listening to his interview with Dr. Malone.
It was long but fascinating stuff.
He also had an interview with Dr McCullough, who is a legit Top Tier guy in all of this, who also said that everything was wrong.
If I’m not mistaken one of these interviews got 30 million views/listens.
“What exactly makes Dr Malone “the mRNA inventor”?”
“I am (Dr. Malone) an internationally recognized scientist/physician and the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. I hold numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines: including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.”
” I invented the core mRNA vaccine technology platform. “
There it is.
I’m not. They are in way too deep to ever pivot back to honest reporting, now. The consequences for senior management would be far too high. Same goes for Big Pharma execs and the medical establishment,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.