Posted on 01/02/2022 2:16:55 PM PST by MtnClimber
No reply - watters v Fauci?
TExasGator- Still claiming that Malone doesn’t have mRNA vaccine patents…
After they have been posted to you.
If it wasn’t so pathetic. I would just say it is silly.
“TExasGator- Still claiming that Malone doesn’t have mRNA vaccine patents…”
He doesn’t have vaccine patents.
“TExasGator- Still claiming that Malone doesn’t have mRNA vaccine patents…”
Interesting! Dr. Malone invented a vaccine that does not work on Covid and instead kills people.
“TExasGator- Still claiming that Malone doesn’t have mRNA vaccine patents…
After they have been posted to you.
If it wasn’t so pathetic. I would just say it is silly.”
You didn’t call them vaccine patents. They were “vaccine enabling patents’.
Keep your story straight.
The mRNA vaccines would not work without this technology.
Now you are going to try to re-define your way out of being incorrect and obtuse?
Good luck with that…
.
.
.
.
.
Not
“The mRNA vaccines would not work without this technology.”
Everything he did was done before.
Nonsense - he wouldn’t have multiple patents if the slop you spew was remotely close to the truth.
Patent 5,533,051, issued in 1996, covers a technique that purports to compress any data set by at least one bit without loss of information—a process that, if done recursively, could shrink the Encyclopaedia Britannica to a single word from which the original could be flawlessly reconstructed. The very idea is preposterous. Yet the patent office agonized for three years over the application—and in the end approved it.
So, based on the fact that there once (several times even) have been patents granted that are preposterous, you are refuting the claim that this scientist’s patents are invalid.
That is perhaps the most preposterous logical fallacy posted on the internet today.
How are you not too embarrassed to write that?
Is that really the best rebuttal you have?
Thanks for the amusement!
You post makes nonsense look credible
I see the post went right over your head.
Are you claiming Dr. invented the ineffective killer vaccine?
No, but I am claiming that he has patents on technologies related to the technologies used in the vaccine. Specifically, patents on the lipid nano particle protective delivery coating. He likely has more patents, but that patent is one of the few that I posted to you - from the us patent database.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.