Beware Pfizer’s New Antiviral COVID Treatment Drug Paxlovid

NOQ Report ^ | 12/30/2021 | Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn

[z3n]

They put the pax in the air processors. 0.1% of the population had the opposite reaction.

[Retain Mike]

I visited websites listing the few adverse side effects of pneumonia and shingles vaccines, which are injection site soreness, fever and chills, fatigue, muscle aches, severe allergic reaction, decreased appetite, chest pain, fast/irregular heartbeat, seizures, headache, stomach pain, and nausea.

Those for COBID 19 vaccines are numerous. The American Heart Association uses the PLUS Cardiac Test to generate a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). They concluded that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

A federal judge ordered Food and Drug Administration (FDA) compliance with a Freedom of Information Act request to disclose Pfizer data that factored into the agency’s recent decision granting the experimental mRNA vaccine an Emergency Use Authorization. The first release of data recorded over 800 adverse side effects. Most prominent were acute myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, cardiac failure, cardiogenic shock, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, stress cardiomyopathy, tachycardia, liver injury, facial paralysis, immune mediated/autoimmune disorders, arthritis, chronic fatigue syndrome, polyarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, fibromyalgia/trigeminal neuralgia, amniotic cavity infection, congenital anomaly, death neonatal, eclampsia, and fetal distress syndrome.

Pfizer in their general overview of about 42,086 cases of adverse effects in ninety days found 20,112 recovered, 1,233 died, and the balance pended resolution.

So, does the FDA have any credibility left after that decision, which would make ue think this one is any bettet.

Partial Bibliography:

Court Orders FDA To Comply With FOIA and Release Information On Pfizer Vaccine – First Batch of Documents Shows Over 1,200 Vaccine Deaths WITHIN FIRST 90 DAYS

https://thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/court-orders-fda-comply-foia-release-information-pfizer-eua-first-batch-documents-shows-1200-vaccine-deaths-within-first-90-days/ 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

American Heart Association Circulation Journal

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

[SeekAndFind]

Here’s a question posed by the author:

“Does the public really want to take an HIV/AIDS drug?”

Paxlovid isn’t used for HIV/AIDS is it? It works via similar mechanism but is NOT strictly an HIV/AIDS drug.

Let’s take Hydroxychloroquine for instance, it was developed to fight MALARIA, but was discovered to be useful for Covid.

Ivermectin was developed to fight parasites and River Blindness and found to be useful for animals as well ( e.g. horses ).

Similarity does not mean equality.

So, my question is — What exactly is the problem?

[Nifster]

Or try famatodine

[sauropod]

bkmk

[jaycieg1]

You are correct in stating Paxlovid is not an HIV/AIDS drug, but the question “Does the public really want to take an HIV/AIDS drug?”is directed toward the fact that:

“Paxlovid requires combination with an HIV/AIDS drug, Ritonavir”.

That may be the problem.

[Cold Heart]

To be picky, Ivermectin was developed for use in horse first, then humans. The original goal may have been human though.

[Trillian]

And we should all trust it because they do so well with “vaccines”. /s

[Right Wing Assault]

If some idiot overdoses on Paxlovid, then that's the reason that no human should use it.

That's the ivermectin rule.

[Retain Mike]

I can’t add to what jaycieg1 said.