Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Omicron sweeps across nation, now 73% of new US COVID cases
AP ^ | 20 December 2021 | MIKE STOBBE

Posted on 12/20/2021 7:22:17 PM PST by blueplum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last
To: jurroppi1

https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions

The data is being misrepresented by journalists.

The 73% number is a United States Nowcast model estimate of variants. It’s a mathematical projection and another example of fear porn! It’s a SWAG projection

Scientific Wild Ass Guess.

It is either not understood by your average layman or is being intentionally misrepresented and repeated by journalists.

Norway and Denmarks numbers are based on actual genomic testic not mathematical modelling estimates.

Nowcast definition from the CDC web page.

Nowcast is a model that estimates more recent proportions of circulating variants and enables timely public health action. CDC is providing weekly Nowcast estimates which will be updated every week on Tuesday.

Check out

https://covariants.org/per-country.


81 posted on 12/22/2021 8:50:38 AM PST by lurked_for_a_decade (Imagination is more important than knowledge! ( e_uid == 0 ) != ( e_uid = 0 ). I Read kernel code.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: lurked_for_a_decade

Weighted estimates are adjusted after the fact and have historically been now where near Nowcast projections. The 73% number is fear porn. The default on the web site is to show projections. Not the hstorical weighted averages.


82 posted on 12/22/2021 9:02:21 AM PST by lurked_for_a_decade (Imagination is more important than knowledge! ( e_uid == 0 ) != ( e_uid = 0 ). I Read kernel code.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: lurked_for_a_decade

I have always wondered about the sample rate and the sample size, let alone selection of which samples are sequenced - I have cautioned regarding this since I first heard about the CDC/NIH/WHO and associated testing sites/genomic sequencing labs information.

For example: (based on the info from covariants.org) in MN about 1000 tests have been sequenced in roughly the last month.

I don’t now, nor have I in the past believed that the sample size and selection were adequate to get a proper estimate or truly be statistically significant for future predictions until several months’ worth of data have been collected.

We aren’t there yet.


83 posted on 12/23/2021 7:52:49 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The Left doesn't have ideas, it has cliches. H/T Flick Lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson