Posted on 12/20/2021 11:46:25 AM PST by ransomnote
Nothing is going to happen here. Durham is deep state and DOJ is about anything but the rule of law. I’ll believe Durham actually doing something when I see it.
Put on hold, or labeled as “dirty tricks against a political opponent”.
I think she is running to imply that any prosecution against her is just Republicans who skeerd she’ll win EVEN MORE VOTES THAN BRANDON!
“ I’ll believe Durham actually doing something when I see it.”
No you won’t.
He’s doing something right now and you don’t see it.
You members of the Eeyore club do nothing but whine and complain, and your post here proves that. Durham is rolling up the entire thing and here you are like a 5 year old in the back seat asking if we are there yet. These things take time, and now that it’s finally happening, the Eeyore club still isn’t happy.
Tick tock!
Probably after the FDA Pfizer documents in 2075.
The "5 year old" that started asking the question is now 10 years old. It's been that long.
US Marshall is providing security
The “5 year old” that started asking the question is now 10 years old. It’s been that long.
> Durham was appointed when?
It seems like Durham is just the latest face of the long stall.
Clinton knows the game of having your attorney “represent” all the defendants in your circle of corruption. You get to control the strategy, know all the parts, and stop any deals to squeal. Beth Wilkinson was lawyer for a herd of Clintonians during the illegal server whitewash, though of course she truly represented only Hillary’s interests.
—> You members of the Eeyore club do nothing but whine and complain, and your post here proves that.
+1
“With that in mind, I leave you this bit of information provided by the New York Times in September (emphasis added) suggesting the complicity of the Clinton Campaign:
Some of the questions that Mr. Durham’s team has been asking in recent months — including of witnesses it subpoenaed before a grand jury, according to people familiar with some of the sessions — suggest he has been pursuing a theory that the Clinton campaign used Perkins Coie to submit dubious information to the F.B.I. about Russia and Mr. Trump in an effort to gin up investigative activity to hurt his 2016 campaign.“
————————————————————-
Isn’t this a fact?
There will be no report. Only indictments. 3 so far, a flood of them in the near future.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.