Two things:
1.) You spelled 'brainwashed' wrong.
B,) I think you used 'whom' wrong. Should be 'who', but I could be wrong about that one.
Bonus:
3.) Rabbits don't get to lecture us smarts.
Posted on 12/14/2021 11:14:15 AM PST by ransomnote
Yep, we are all lab rats for Fauci's experiment.
Some years ago, P.D. James wrote a novel called, "Children of Men".
It was a dystopian novel about the how the World ended up not being able to produce any children. There was one, last generation, growing up, now in their late teens and early 20's; but, no children after that. It was bleak. People were pushing strollers and prams with their dogs inside (which I have now actually seen and it freaked me out).
The movie never really got into how we got into this situation; but, after we got into this situation with this "vaccine" (it is not a vaccine), I have been wondering if P.D. James was being prescient about the future. If so, it is a depressing future.
Nope! You post what you got.
I predict it’s not much.
I have plenty.
VAIDS - If it takes hold in the public mind, it will make the vaxtyrants shake in their boots.
If you have a peer-reviewed citation backing up the claims from the dailyexpose.uk article which is the subject of this thread, then post it. I’m quite confident you don’t, though.
So far.
You can just say "who". You are the subject, not the object of some preposition.
It's okay. I've dropped a dozen posts here today that were discordant in agreement of number, but doesn't if feel great to be corrected?
It was YOU that stated the we are ignoring peer-reviewed studies.
So….. what are those studies.
You made the assertion.
You are the one defending this BS from the dailyexpose. Back up your claims with some proof.
You said, “I have plenty.” Let’s see your “plenty” of scientific backup for the nonsense spouted by the dailyexpose in this article.
If it’s BS then you should easily be able to expose that.
You are guilty of the Genetic Fallacy where you attack the origin, or source rather than its current meaning or context.
Did you even read the article?
If so, where are the inaccuracies?
I posted a very specific rebuttal of this garbage the first time, of many times, that you guys posted it on FR. I pulled the original source docs from the NHS and there was *nothing* in there to back up the dailyexpose claims. Since then, you (collective you) have posted this total nonsense at least a dozen times on this site.
Two things:
1.) You spelled 'brainwashed' wrong.
B,) I think you used 'whom' wrong. Should be 'who', but I could be wrong about that one.
Bonus:
3.) Rabbits don't get to lecture us smarts.
Rand Paul will end up being President by default when all other elected officials end up getting AIDS and dying!
dailyexpose.uk quotes reputable people out of context and then exaggerates. Based on their past fear porn articles from the summer, everyone who got the Pfizer vaccine last winter should be dead by now, but it doesn’t seem to have happened. That’s not to say there isn’t a serious problem with these dangerous vaccines, as the Gundry abstract https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712 indicates. I like actor Kevin Sorbo’s humor much better than dailyexpose.uk:
Pick up line of the week:
“Hey girl, your last name must be Pfizer, cause you just made my heart stop.”
“ I posted a very specific rebuttal”
Fair….
But I would like to see that.
This is how back and forth works.
Cite specifics and I counter etc…
Review my previous posts. I’m not regurgitating it. Did you bother to read the source docs from the NHS?
So you are asking me to go look at your previous posts(not on this thread)
Dude you need a refresher course in how to support your argument.
Here is my equally silly response: Go prove yourself wrong!
I am done with you.
I have things to do.
So YOU say.
Based on their past fear porn articles from the summer, everyone who got the Pfizer vaccine last winter should be dead by now, but it doesn’t seem to have happened.
What a ricockulous thing to say. Nobody anywhere EVER said that. Well, except for the vaxtard rabbits here who pretend that WE say that. And by 'we' I mean us pureblood smarts who ain't afraid to see and talk truth.
“Hey girl, your last name must be Pfizer, cause you just made my heart stop.”
"Hey girl, is your name Adolph Moderna cause you just committed mass murder".
Now you.
Source docs from the NHS? Your kidding, right? Might as well read source docs form Fauci's crib notes. Or the CDC, or FDA, or WHO, or NIH, or Snopes. Need I go on?
See, this is why you're full of shiznit. You believe stuff from the derp state organizations.
#Rabbit
The only thing the vaccines do is provide limited protection to the person getting the vaccine. That is the vaccinated are less likely to end up in the hospital or dead from an infection. It does not prevent a vaccinated person from getting an infection and being a super spreader with a high viral load.
And no one knows with certainty what the long term effects of the vaccine will be for the vaccinated (large scale effect).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.