Posted on 12/05/2021 9:41:07 AM PST by SeekAndFind
just a hunch, I’d put money on it.
He was an honorable man.
And we thought only government could sell something that doesn’t work and continue to sell it
Let’s not forget the fact that they pretty much taken over the Federal drug administration
“Regulatory capture” has been a “thing” for at least a hundred years.
It is so easy even chimps can do it.
No wonder they don’t want ivermectin. No profit in that.
God this burns me up. Fauci minting new billionaires on our grandkid’s dime, while Ivermectin is all but banned.
Lamposts badly needed.
FOLLOW THE MONEY
Awww, poor baby.
And a huge part of our population clap like sealions “big pharma, yay!!!!!”
I’d LOVE to know exactly which of our wonderful politicians have invested in Pfizer and Moderna.
..and, it’s be nice to know exactly WHEN they got in too.
SeekAndFind wrote: “Do you have reliable figures (anti-vaxxers making milliohns) for this? A Source perhaps? Thanks.”
Google “america’s front line doctors profits”
Then google “children’s health defense fund”
Then google “Dr. Andrew Kaufman” “Dr. Thomas Cowan” “Sally Fallon Morell, MA”
Then google any anti-vaxxer your like.
or simply read this:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/17/covid-misinformation-conspiracy-theories-ccdh-report
And also, the Biden Cartel..
SeekAndFind wrote: “Edit to add... are natural therapeutics COMPULSORY and COERCED under the threat of losing your livelihood, your right to travel, to eat at a diner, etc. ?”
Why make them compulsory, they don’t work.
Did Pfizer pay China to do this, or did they go the cheap route and pay Fauci to make it happen?
Did 10% of the profits go to Biden and Fauci?
RE: Why make them compulsory, they don’t work.
Well, if they don’t work, the free market will quickly show that they don’t.
But the market is there.
Why not make the vaccines non-compulsory and see which ones are more effective?
I Googled and here’s what I found:
“AFLDS and SpeakWithAnMD have earned more than $6.7 million “for facilitating paid telehealth consultations and off-label prescriptions for the Coronavirus”
Given that Telehealth consultations are about $90, and there are scores of Frontline doctors doing this work, WITHOUT USING TAX PAYER DOLLARS, I would not call it profiteering at all.
It’s a reasonable fee for medical service.
The fact that they’re getting referals from people who are getting well WITHOUT COERCION ( Unlike the vaccines ) says a lot about how good their service is. And think about it... they’re doing this work in the face of government suppression, unlike Pfizer, which is getting its money from government COERCION.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.