Skip to comments.
How much money can you make promising to get satellites into orbit with a slingshot?
American Thinker ^
| 3 Dec, 2021
| Mick Rich
Posted on 12/03/2021 4:08:23 AM PST by MtnClimber
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: MtnClimber
Why not use birds to fly the satellites into orbit. I would use African Swallows.
2
posted on
12/03/2021 4:08:42 AM PST
by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: MtnClimber
What is the airspeed of a satellite-laden African Swallow?
3
posted on
12/03/2021 4:13:19 AM PST
by
struggle
To: struggle
4
posted on
12/03/2021 4:17:56 AM PST
by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
To: MtnClimber
I was picturing a carrier catapult a couple miles long..
“Spinlaunch will subject the satellites to ten thousand times the force of gravity,”
5
posted on
12/03/2021 4:18:40 AM PST
by
jughandle
(Big words anger me, keep talking. )
To: jughandle
The forces from a rocket launch are a big consideration in satellite with weight limiting the mechanical design. This would seem magnitudes worse.
6
posted on
12/03/2021 4:21:42 AM PST
by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: MtnClimber
Maybe they could add voter registration and mail-in ballot boxes at their launch site for public support.
7
posted on
12/03/2021 4:23:50 AM PST
by
Tagurit
(Are your pigs fed, watered and ready to fly?)
To: MtnClimber
Have your African Swallows been jabbed?
8
posted on
12/03/2021 4:23:53 AM PST
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: MtnClimber
Seems like more of a trebuchet than a slingshot.
Agreed a far-fetched concept. No pun intended. Well maybe a little..
9
posted on
12/03/2021 4:24:10 AM PST
by
sonova
(That's what I always say sometimes.)
To: MtnClimber
Politicians are in most cases, pretty ignorant and corrupt. The rest are simply corrupt. They are gullible to any scheme that promises high tech and lots of money flowing into the county or state or even the country simply because they know that a lot of that money will end up in a plain manila envelope in their pocket.
Spinlaunch is no different from Solendra or any of the EV manufactures or solar cell or even malls and manufacturer’s outlets. Operators like the Brothers Yaney cannot operate without corrupt and gullible politicians, mostly very wealthy politicians by the time they retire. Think Obama, Pelosi, McConnell and a myriad or others. 435 in the House and 100 in the Senate for starters.
10
posted on
12/03/2021 4:27:21 AM PST
by
Tupelo
To: MtnClimber
The G’s from one of those slingshot rides are bad enough! I can’t even fathom 10,000x. I’m no expert but I’d imagine that would crush a car pretty quick.
11
posted on
12/03/2021 4:30:04 AM PST
by
jughandle
(Big words anger me, keep talking. )
To: MtnClimber
12
posted on
12/03/2021 4:31:03 AM PST
by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
To: sonova
How is the payload going to survive the enormous centrifugal force that would unavoidably accompany the process of achieving escape velocity prior to launch via trebuchet?
To: MtnClimber
How about ATO
(Airship To Orbit)?
These guys are doing it all on their own dollar (or donation). No government subsidy and so far they are making good progress.
The physics is just a little iffy as to whether or not it can really be done with current technology. But, that's what research is all about. It would be a really cheap way to space if it can be made to work.
To: MtnClimber
The launce speed that they quoted was 5,000 mph. That would be nowhere near the speed required for a satallite in orbit (17,000 mph).
That is without even considering the huge(!) aerodynamic friction that the satallite would see on assent. The thing would look like a flamming meteor going up.
To: MtnClimber
The project suffered delays when celebrated rocket engineer Mike Hughes died while trying to launch his steam powered rocket
16
posted on
12/03/2021 4:55:49 AM PST
by
cyclotic
(I won't give up my FREEDOM for your FEAR)
To: \/\/ayne
Yeah, I would not want to be in one of those little buildings when the thing disintegrates. I would want to be 100 miles away at least.
17
posted on
12/03/2021 4:59:35 AM PST
by
Wilhelm Tell
(True or False? This is not a tag line.)
To: MtnClimber
Yeah, 10,000 gs?! About the only thing that will survive launch is a solid metal sphere. So great if you want to launch calsats, kind of useless for any real satellite.
18
posted on
12/03/2021 5:03:01 AM PST
by
ThunderSleeps
(Biden/Harris - illegitimate and everyone knows it.)
To: jughandle
Satellites need a specific velocity to maintain the orbit they are in. This speed is high enough that satellites burn up when they contact the upper atmosphere. In this case the slingshot velocity would need to be much greater than the orbital velocity to account for atmospheric drag and the change in potential energy between the Earth’s surface and the orbital height. That higher velocity would be at the dense part of the atmoshere right at the Earth’s surface. Preventing it from melting in the first 100,000 feet would be a big challenge.
19
posted on
12/03/2021 5:05:46 AM PST
by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: MtnClimber
Just use anti-gravity. Not that hard. Like frozen magnets and shit.
20
posted on
12/03/2021 5:09:19 AM PST
by
HYPOCRACY
(This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson