Observations of Possible Microbiota in COVID mRNA Vaccines by Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid (many images)

orwell.city ^ | October 16, 2021 | Dr. Pablo Campra

[smileyface]

And all of those surgical masks we need to wear.

[laplata]

That’s right. The list is very long.

[faucetman]

“He needs to use clean slides, and/or a different method for transferring the fluid from the vials. Those are contaminants, but not from the vials.”

Oh yeah, that’s it. /s

The scientist probably didn’t know that you need clean slides. /s

He should have come here to FR for instruction before using his electron microscope. /s

[faucetman]

“The give away here, and there are a few, AstraZeneca, J&J, are totally different vaccines than Pfizer and Moderna.”

Exactly the opposite conclusion should be reached.

Having the same “junk” in the samples proves the collusion conspiracy by big pharma to greatly reduce the human population of the planet.

Denying what you can see with your own eyes is telling.

What is this, the fifth or sixth group of scientists finding the same junk in the vaxxines?

Are they ALL guilty of using “dirty slides”?

The “dirty slides” excuse is laughable on its face.

You must be in the water isn’t wet and bears pee in the pond group.

[Gritty]

As the crowds on these threads dwindle more and more every week…….I wonder why?

Oh! Oh Teecher Lemmee Guess!! ..., um, ... because there are @zzh0le shills like yourself coming over to bother everybody with their boolsheet and misinformation?

[ransomnote]

So they messed with them, instead of just taking pictures of the vaccine.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
False.
They photographed some samples directly.
They cultured other samples to gather different types of photos of the cultivar later.

[ransomnote]

Jab: Scientist Discovers Hatching Eggs, Parasites Birthed After Injection (partial transcript, some images from 14 min video, related links)
rumble ^ | October 15, 2021 | Stew Peters, Dr. Jane Ruby, the work of Dr. Zelusky

Dr. Zandre Botha: Never Before Seen: Blood Doctor Reveals HORRIFIC Findings After Examining Vials (link, a few notes and images for this 21 minute video)
brighteon.com ^ | October 4, 2021 | Stew Peters, Dr. Zandre Botha

Dr. Carrie Madej: First U.S. Lab Examines “Vaccine” Vials, HORRIFIC [partial transcript and 16 min video. The content is stunning, important-please share]
redvoicemedia.com ^ | September 29, 2021 | Stew Peters, Dr. Carry Madej

Dr John B. @DrJohnB2 (1/n) A microscopy analysis of a Moderna #Covidvaccine sample.A fresh sample was analyzed with bright field and phase contrast microscopy.
twitter.com ^ | October 11, 2021 | Dr John B. @DrJohnB2

Dr. Robert Young Finds Graphene Oxide in All Four Vaccines and Other Disturbing Ingredients [Wealth of information, additional sources images at link]

RECEIPTS! Patent PROVES Vaxx is Obedience Training Platform - THE FINAL VARIANT! (redvoicemedia.com) [Partial transcript and 18 minute video - PLEASE WATCH AND SHARE!]
redvoicemedia.com ^ | 10/13/2021 | Stew Peters, Karen Kingston

[ransomnote]

This reinforces my long held suspicions about what the Chinese are putting in our medicines.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yes. WHy fight us when they can quietly poison us.

[neverevergiveup]

Never make the mistake of assuming that because someone with a doctorate says and/or publishes something that it is true. Pablo Campra has a PhD in Chemical Sciences, and has no specific expertise in imaging or in purity analysis of medications.

None of that invalidates what he found, but it does underscore my point that just because something gets published doesn't mean it's true OR meaningful.

Many of us have seen the things he shows pictures of as artifacts or contaminants while doing microscopy.

The bigger issues with regards the current vaccines include that 1. the efficacy appears to have been significantly overstated, 2. Having antibodies only against the spike protein is likely to be less effective than having polyclonal antibodies against a broader spectrum of Covid antigens - including against the nucleocapsid, 3. The antibodies against the spike protein could theoretically have adverse effects - including pro-thrombotic effects and potentially cross-reactivity to native proteins. 4. Antibody-dependent enhancement is also a possibility. etc.

That said, what this guy saw in a small observational light microscopy study is not ringing alarm bells.

[humblegunner]

That said, what this guy saw in a small observational light microscopy study is not ringing alarm bells.

He's a dirty Spaniard with dirty slides and a dollar store microscope
trying to score some Youtube or blogtard fame. He probably doesn't
even speak English. Nobody who doesn't speak English should be trusted EVER.

Instead of faking up pictures of ditch water he ought to be working
in a taco truck, taking English lessons at night.

If he even exists at all which is questionable.

Freakin' Eurotrash fake dude with his ditch water and dollar store microscope.

[laplata]

You’re right.

[neverevergiveup]

In all the decades of looking at things under a microscope, how many "new" or "unknown" or "never been seen before" contaminants are still out there in a well-run laboratory?

A lot of weird artifacts and/or contaminants shows up during microscopy. You'd be surprised.

If they are contaminants, wouldn't they be recognized?

Sometimes. Not always.

If they are contaminants, wouldn't the scientists check for that and thoroughly sterilize the equipment and then look again?

Yes, they should. This would include cleaning the microscope objectives/lenses and light source as well. Also, they should run controls (open vials of other vaccines and/or medicines and examine them exactly the same way - in parallel, using the same equipment and technique).

You are right about comparing results from multiple labs.

I'm not trying to be a naysayer, but I have to be honest about what my impressions or that data are. It it's valid data, prove it by being more rigorous.

[neverevergiveup]

I know you're being tongue in cheek, but sheesh.. I have respect for people everywhere, and actually can't stand the ‘mainstream science’ dogma that dismisses things that don't follow the script. That said, his data, in their present form, just aren't convincing of anything.

[Political Junkie Too]

Also, they should run controls (open vials of other vaccines and/or medicines and examine them exactly the same way - in parallel, using the same equipment and technique).

Wouldn't just plain distilled water on a slide work? If the same contaminants show up, then it's something with the equipment?

I'm just a layperson, but a cursory look at the photos seems, to me, to show contaminants in all of the vaccines, but the types of contaminants seems to be contained to each vaccine. In other words, each vaccine seems to have its own distinct type of contaminants.

If the equipment were dirty, wouldn't the same contaminants be seen in all the samples?

-PJ

[Fury]

It it's valid data, prove it by being more rigorous.

Doubtful. Doubtful he will submit his research for peer review, or file a complaint with the FDA for possible contamination of vaccines.

Even if FDA punts on a complaint of alleged contaminated vaccines, he would have documentation that he did so.

His not doing any of that speaks volumes of his confidence in his own findings.

[Political Junkie Too]

His not doing any of that speaks volumes of his confidence in his own findings.

I don't think this is a research study paper in the classic sense.

I think this is near real-time analysis that they are reporting on while it's in progress.

I'm not positive of this, so please prove to me that I'm wrong so that we can both know.

He says things like "Well, that’s what we have for now. Tomorrow, surely, we’ll show more videos." This leads me to reach the conclusion that I did, which is that they are doing the research now and simply reporting out as they go.

-PJ

[Political Junkie Too]

In fact, wouldn't that imply extreme confidence in his findings that he's willing to put it all out there in real time and then take whatever hits come his way?

-PJ

[humblegunner]

I don't think this is a research study paper in the classic sense.

Nope. It's some Euro-Mexican that wants Youtube hits.

Because he has a dollar store microscope and some ditch water and wants some pennies-per-click traffic.

You ever see any other "science" presented this way?

But you've seen click-bait trash presented this way, huh?

[Fury]

In fact, wouldn't that imply extreme confidence in his findings that he's willing to put it all out there in real time and then take whatever hits come his way?

That’s one way of looking at it.

But that he has not yet as far as I know submitted his research to a journal where other subject matter experts and researchers can review and critique calls into question (from my perspective) his confidence in his findings.

[reformedliberal]

As far as I am aware (there may be more):

Germany
Austria
Spain
Argentina
Poland
USA

Similar *things* observed. Vials only. Same researchers saw derangement in blood cells, similar across many countries.

Makes one think.