Posted on 10/16/2021 12:49:01 PM PDT by ransomnote
Comforting.
đđ
Thank you.
“The public is tuning in to independent people actually putting âvaccineâ samples under a microscope”
I agree with HG on this, even if I stipulate that all those “weird things” have been found in the vaccine.
I stipulate weird and bad things are in the vaccine for sake of discussion:
Maybe they were in the vial when the vaccine was added (contamination from the vial supplier, accidental or not, doesn’t matter).
Real research would mean getting samples of the empty vials before they are filled and analyzing them for contaminants.
What if the weird stuff is contamination from the needles, not the vaccine? Same rigor must be applied.
From the time the vial was filled until it came into the hands of the researcher, how many different people had custody and who were they? Was the vial seal intact? Was it a used vial with a needle hole or a pristine untampered vial?
How many vials have been analyzed and were the same weird things found in none, some or all of the other vials? Research requires that multiple samples be examined and compared.
Same with the needles.
Finding stuff in the vaccine doesn’t prove the vaccine itself is contaminated.
Controlled pristine vaccine amounts must analyzed that have not been put in vials.
These videos are meaningless even if true!
The only possible fair conclusion at this point is: No conclusion can be made about the claims in the videos without much more research.
| SaxxonWoods wrote: |
âThe public is tuning in to independent people actually putting âvaccineâ samples under a microscopeâ I agree with HG on this, even if I stipulate that all those âweird thingsâ have been found in the vaccine. I stipulate weird and bad things are in the vaccine for sake of discussion: Maybe they were in the vial when the vaccine was added (contamination from the vial supplier, accidental or not, doesnât matter). Real research would mean getting samples of the empty vials before they are filled and analyzing them for contaminants. What if the weird stuff is contamination from the needles, not the vaccine? Same rigor must be applied. From the time the vial was filled until it came into the hands of the researcher, how many different people had custody and who were they? Was the vial seal intact? Was it a used vial with a needle hole or a pristine untampered vial? How many vials have been analyzed and were the same weird things found in none, some or all of the other vials? Research requires that multiple samples be examined and compared. Same with the needles. Finding stuff in the vaccine doesnât prove the vaccine itself is contaminated. Controlled pristine vaccine amounts must analyzed that have not been put in vials. These videos are meaningless even if true! The only possible fair conclusion at this point is: No conclusion can be made about the claims in the videos without much more research. |
*
Each of us will decide for ourselves whether there is any sort of merit in the content. All reporting on this, including the researchers and reporters in the video, are asking questions and 'wishing' for research that won't be allowed to happen.
I understand the point you make about needles. I'm wondering if you do? Why is there a problem drawing a sample from a Pfizer bottle? Needles are not unique to Pfizer. Manufacturing clean dosage vials should be a known science by now. While there are unknowns, I am routinely suprised at how much 'willing suspension of disbelief' the "Covid Vaccines" require. Almost 2 years now of constantly being told not to use our eyes or our reasoning and wait for...the CDC? Fauci? The NIH? Someone to come along and say it was all a mistake?
Interesting that you feel the need to assert that the videos are meaningless. I think it does what it is supposed to do - it wakes people up and gets them to ask questions. No more sleeping. Fauci and the medical machinery is not 'asleep'. Neither should the public sleep. This is our health - we should be actively involved and yes, asking questions and MAKING THEM GIVE US ANSWERS. No more 'let's wait because there isn't sufficient research' because we know that research will never happen.
“Why is there a problem drawing a sample from a Pfizer bottle?”
This is a perfect example of what I’m talking about. And the fact you write that without even realizing you are cutting yourself off at the knees demonstrates you have a blind spot when it comes to orthodox skepticism and due diligence.
I’m worried someone will steal all your money someday because you are gullible. Take care out there, not everyone tells the truth or has the agenda they present as true.
You also post some very good things that lead one to think, a desirable thing. Keep doing that.
Ping
| SaxxonWoods wrote: |
âWhy is there a problem drawing a sample from a Pfizer bottle?â This is a perfect example of what Iâm talking about. And the fact you write that without even realizing you are cutting yourself off at the knees demonstrates you have a blind spot when it comes to orthodox skepticism and due diligence. Iâm worried someone will steal all your money someday because you are gullible. Take care out there, not everyone tells the truth or has the agenda they present as true. You also post some very good things that lead one to think, a desirable thing. Keep doing that. |
*
I say something is likely wrong with Pfizer 'vaccines' and post an article. You say, "but the vial..." that we can't know unless we start before the vial. And you say this research is meaningless.
I say it's not meaningless and use your vial. Okay what about the vial? You say I'm cutting myself off at the knees and I don't know it.
I say I'm making the point that the research has value. Okay if it's as you say, it needs to be tested from the vial, where's the research. Don't just shut down anything anyone says as 'meaningless'.
The needed research will not happen through official channels. If it did, who would trust it? They are killing us with a vaccine we have to get to have a job. Isn't that statement enough? We have to have an experimental 'shot' to keep employment for a disease that is 99.97% survivable? All other offenses build up on this - why can't we have FDA approved Ivermectin? Why are they forcing the use of Toxic Remdesivir and lethal intubation?
Citizen Researchers are working to put evidence before us and while it's not difinitive, it's not 'meaningless.' Pro Tip: The Lancet is bought off and functions as the medical Pravda now. The universiities? Federal funding. ANyone coming forward? Canceled.
It doesn't mean I believe anything anyone says, but it means I don't dismiss it out of hand because Fauci/CDC h as not approved it. They are weaponized. It's us against them and I'd like us to survive.
Ivermectin probably kills this, explains why they don’t want us to take a “animal dewormer”
“...for a disease that is 99.97% survivable”
This is the part that still blows my mind! In otherwise rational people, the cognitive dissonance on that stat is so dense that they can’t seem to take it in.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.