Now you;re gonna post about science, bumpkin? Probly best if you stick to bloggers, the recipe for meth, and 'shine.
#StayInYourLane
Posted on 10/01/2021 12:38:37 PM PDT by ransomnote
Must have been my imagination. That molecular biology prof had me totally duped. I was just a kid, after all. And the magnification reported on the TEM must have been faked. Either that, or I was looking at the world’s smallest bacteria, just nanometers wide.
Really, I can’t convince you of what I routinely saw. But I choose to believe my lying eyes, and the work of my own hands. Apologies.
Ping!
| rightwingcrazy wrote: |
Must have been my imagination. That molecular biology prof had me totally duped. I was just a kid, after all. And the magnification reported on the TEM must have been faked. Either that, or I was looking at the world’s smallest bacteria, just nanometers wide. Really, I can’t convince you of what I routinely saw. But I choose to believe my lying eyes, and the work of my own hands. Apologies. |
*
You made common mistakes - one that people experienced in TEM analysis wouldn't make. I called you out on it and so you changed your electron micrscope to TEM and aren't mentioning your microtome wouldn't work, it would have to be an ultra microtome. Those who worked the labs just don't confuse those pieces of equipment.
I accept your apologies.
| Skywise wrote: |
Sorry - this is BS. They HAVE smallpox and measle samples. It’s how they made the viruses from them and they’ve been studying the evolution of them compared to other variations. (Also how it was used for early biowarfare.) |
*
I'm reading through the research and so far the most likely explanation for the CDC's refusal to admit there are any isolated samples, and the number of times I've come across papers with related theories like this one, may have something to do with exosomes. Weaponized exosomes.
I think it was 2019 when president Trump's DOJ arrested Chinese researchers, who specialized in exosome reasearch, as they attempted to escape the US with stolen research.
China had 1000 Talents program and that meant their researchers worked in the US, and or Americans worked for China without admitting to it. When it was discovered, they tended to take flash drives and run for international airports - a few being detained in Canada and/or Washington.
So far, the theory I've seen which best explains why the entire plandemic is being conducted without isolated samples of the virus seems seems to point to exosomes which are then intentionally misidendtified as 'viruses'. If the CDC isn't afraid to show what they have, then where's the isolated samples? It's not rude to ask for isolated samples of the Covid-19 virus if it's crushing the life out of America, and freedome world-wide.
CDC/NIH control federal funding and lab access, and access to science journals (publishing peer reviewed research) so it's possible to find articles that say the 'right things.' But over and over, oddities like these FOIA's keep turning up.
As usual, if the CDC wan'ts to clarify, the public is willing to listen. But way back when the public was asking about the fake PCR, the CDC wouldn't address it and just ridicules anyone who questions the narrative as 'anti science.' For all aspects of their treasonous actions, the CDC won't/can't explain and we're just supposed to accept that our public servants can't provide a straight answer to questions or even pretend to acknowledge a large portion of what is really going on.
What a bunch of crap. Is the author of this drivel expecting us to believe that no scientist, anywhere or at any time, has ever sequenced a viral genome?
This is crackpottery and makes FR look like a loony bin.
I posted this article after about 18 months of hearing complaints about the lack of available isolated samples of Covid-19.
I don’t know why there are no isolated samples available for neutral or patriot researchers, and now these FOIA’s show the CDC stating there are no isolated samples for many of the disease for which we are vaccinated.
Dr. Lee Merrit wonder aloud about this mystery.
Dr. Judy Mikovits asserts she checked research papers that claim they have isolated the Covid virus, but they used lavage (mixed samples) and portrayed falsely portrayed work done on monkey vero kidney cells (a cell like Mikovits developed while working at the NIH decades ago) as isolated virus samples from people cells.
What’s going on? What is the CDC hiding?
Appreciated.
TEM = transmission electron microscope, IOW a type of electron microscope that examines the electrons that go through a specimen, distinguished from SEMs or REMs, say. That’s why you have to cut the specimens so thin, to allow the electrons to tunnel through. Ultramicrotomes are a subclass of microtomes, as their name implies. To insist otherwise is pedantic. Researchers experienced in the field aren’t like that, not the good ones.
It’s not nice to imply that I was lying. My career is not in the biological sciences; I was relating experiences at university, nearly 50 years ago. My memories fade, but they’re good enough. I’d be shocked if those tiny things that I was looking at were bacteria. They were too small, and their morphology was suggestive of a function, to inject genetic material into bacteria.
Now you;re gonna post about science, bumpkin? Probly best if you stick to bloggers, the recipe for meth, and 'shine.
#StayInYourLane
As usual, a well thought out analysis and reply, noob.
How can this be?
I imagine the court high priests/doctors losing their minds when some rando tried to tell them the earth was round and orbited around the sun back in the day.
No..for my Masters Thesis I isolated DISLOCATIONS in metal matrix with a TEM. SMALL stuff.
| rightwingcrazy wrote: |
Appreciated. TEM = transmission electron microscope, IOW a type of electron microscope that examines the electrons that go through a specimen, distinguished from SEMs or REMs, say. That’s why you have to cut the specimens so thin, to allow the electrons to tunnel through. Ultramicrotomes are a subclass of microtomes, as their name implies. To insist otherwise is pedantic. Researchers experienced in the field aren’t like that, not the good ones. It’s not nice to imply that I was lying. My career is not in the biological sciences; I was relating experiences at university, nearly 50 years ago. My memories fade, but they’re good enough. I’d be shocked if those tiny things that I was looking at were bacteria. They were too small, and their morphology was suggestive of a function, to inject genetic material into bacteria. |
*
You started this conversation with marked sarcasm - I thought 'nice' was of no interest to you.
The CDC HAS to know whether or not there are isolated samples of these viruses and said there aren't. I'm raising the issue because living day to day with the CDC 'getting away with' constant deceipt while destroying the US bothers me. If the CDC wants to clarify why it says these samples don't exist, many would love to hear it.
The CDC owes us the truth. Why do we just have to accept whatever lie they throw at us as if they are our superiors?
At what point have they officially jumped the shark? This is laughable on its face.
There you are, my biggest fan! I love that I’ve gotten under your skin.
Yes. Among other things she has her Ph.D in virology. You can’t argue with stupid. And posting such an obviously nonsensical post as virus has never been isolated then arguing everyone is wrong who has a modicum of scientific understanding makes her … well … I can’t quite find the word.
But this kind of crap makes all is is conservatives look like idiots.
A handful of conspiracy theorists are making us all look bad. But at least there is some entertainment value. Sometimes you need a good laugh
What would the CDC’s FOIA office’s reply look like if I requested all CDC records regarding isolation of SARS-CoV-2 viruses by means of the waving of a magic wand?
~~~~~~~~~
That’s the stupidest attempt at deflection I’ve seen from a troll. C’mon. You’re not even trying.
No one here wants to touch that third rail - no one wants to admit the CDC states via FOIA there are no isolated samples for Covid-19. And that’s fine with you because you’ve steadily supported the MSM/Fauci narrative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.