Posted on 08/24/2021 2:47:44 PM PDT by Morgana
Hands and feet are not identifying marks or tattoos so I’m not sure the same principle applies. Also not sure that documenting marks for the purpose of identification is the same as documenting body parts for evidentiary purposes.
Body searches done for safety and security don’t require a warrant, but evidentiary searches do. And given the massively liberal nature of judges, especially appellate judges, you should never take shortcuts on due process.
I never watched the show at all when it was on, I knew they were fake. However I started paying attention when the scandals started, that is when it got interesting.
This is like “Dallas” in the 1980’s
You ain't kidding there. Most of the religious denomination don't go after men like that but blame their wives and tell everyone else, "don't judge!"
Yup...I watch The Crime Channel 18 hours a day. They do that to establish gang affiliation *and* tattoos are a great way to identify someone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.