Posted on 08/22/2021 12:35:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
“Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies
Great data from global studies. Thank you!
True. But I don’t have the resources to set up the kind of study that needs to be done to determine if it works or not. You are welcome to if you want or find a group that does.
Everyone says someone should pay. No one pays.
I meant to say in the above that we got the hospital to administer ivermectin to her after she had been in the hospital for a few days. The question came up today if the ivermectin created so many antigens that after the Covid ran its course, there was a oversupply of antigens caused by the invermectin that ruined her lungs and caused her pneumonia to become lethal. That is simplified I know, but I’m not a doctor of course so I have no idea. Her doctors were nice enough to suggest that the invermectin played any part. They simply don’t know how to defeat this disease once it gets to a certain level of damage to the lungs. Just sayin’
i am not against freedom to prescribe whatever you want i have said that. However that is not a study. I have been doing this over 35 years. I have seen many treatments in many diseases that everyone “knew” worked or looked very promising. when the studies were actually fine these things turned out tone of no benefit or actually harmful. 18 months in to this is a relatively short time. There not thing i can guarantee is the way we are treating it now will nor be the way we are treating it in two years or even next year. Therapies will change. We have vaccines but will refine them and learn the best dosing schedules for maximum effectiveness Yes most docs who have practiced a while will be skeptical without studies - we have lived through it enough to know
Not sure what your point is but ok
Not sure what your point is but ok
Yes, it is very hard to understand.
So Trump getting Regeneron means Ivermectic and HCQ don’t work?
You trust Wikipedia for that?
Saw your tag line. There are many conservative Christians that have been vaccinated despite what some think
If she had been giving HCQ/Ivermectin and zinc, she would still be here.
You are the o e that said Trump supported hcq. i merely pointed out what he was treated with when he got sick
He supported HCQ and was relentlessly yelled at by anyone with a name and a microphone.
Turns it out works. What we’re witnessing is crimes against humanity and violations of the Nuremberg Code.
That’s true. But it doesn’t negate my premise.
Most that don’t trust the government and mRNA technology are Christians conservative ones
RE: I am not against freedom to prescribe whatever you want i have said that. However that is not a study.
Two things:
1. If you are not against freedom to prescribe, then we are on the same page. I have no argument with you.
2. If you as a doctor don’t believe any of these studies on Ivermectin, you are also free NOT to prescibe it. PAtients who know that you don’t and want Ivermectin can always find other doctors.
We have a common enemy... the virus. We ought to use every weapons at our disposal to fight it.
She had been taking a lot of the so-called “immunity” supplements including zinc. She got the invermectin. I guess it was the lack of HCQ that did her in. I wish you could have been able to convince the doctors at Methodist Hospital if you are sure your diagnosis is so clear.
Funny, I have watched several FLCCC updates on YouTube and I recall Dr Pierre Kory in one episode clearly state he was a liberal.
Agree. that is why I read and answer your posts. You are reasonable and do not attack. FWIW I’m not against ivermectin unless it delays other treatment I’m just not convinced it does anything Yes we should work together and stop the sniping to defeat this thing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.