Posted on 08/20/2021 9:55:41 AM PDT by KamalaKancel
Is impossible to know what the future will be but I know I’m not going to sleep with any of the mentioned political women
Actually, both chambers have to confirm a VP nomination. The House is not in question, but a tied Senate is.
However, Republicans are like herding cats, and McConnell has no control over his caucus like the Democrats do with theirs.
-PJ
Her father is still a Jamaican, never became a US citizen.
“Is VP Kamala Harris an Illegal Alien?”
Is VP Kamala Harris, like Barack Obama, an Illegal Alien?
There, fixed it
No. Next question.
Anchor baby at best. She’s not an American citizen.
even if she is in the country legally, she is still ineligible for the Vice presidency or the presidency (she has cleverly erased all data on her website that indicated the facts of her parents’ foreign status)
Anything she signs, any vote she casts, any utterance of hers, is invalid.
I agree. I think Kamala is really just a place-holder, and she knows it and agreed to this plan.
Where do you see ANYTHING in the 20th Amendment saying the vice-Pretender is “deemed qualified”? I find nothing there that supersedes Art 2, sect 1, para 1 thru 5 of the Constitution which says in part:
“Article II: Executive
Section 1...
... Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:...
... No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, ...”
The parents of Kamala Harris were subjects of India and Jamaica at the time of Kamala's 1964 birth, per the terms of their non-resident non-immigrant student visas.
The mother of Kamala Harris committed multiple acts of fraud on the US immigration system, before and after the birth of Kamala. That is the subject of this discussion: Does an evasion of law invalidate the basis of a claimed citizenship status, such as on official birth record?
The father of Kamala Harris did not renounce his Jamaican citizenship until October 1981, when he naturalized as a US citizen. Kamala was age 17 at that time.
You may have to click on the "X" in the upper left hand corner of the "login" box which appears on the TW screen, to view the documents there. You may also have to reload, to defeat TW issues, should those occur
Kameltoe will pick Buttegieg as a Veep. Not Stacy.
Unless Barack wants her to.
It says “if the president elect shall fail to qualify” or something like that. Once they’re president, that’s that.
What obambam, in his evil brilliance, noted was... this takes place AFTER the election. So the onus is on the SCOTUS to throw out election results AFTER a black dude is voted into office, risking widespread racial riots. So the SCOTUS took a pass.
20th amendment
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2145602/posts
Certifigate Post Mortem
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2168149/posts
Not true. Please review the documents. Kamala's mother stated her nationality was as a subject of India. She never naturalized to the US, instead she extended her "temporary" student visa into an stay of 16 years, from 1958 to 1976.
"There are only two classes of American citizens, naturalized and natural born. There is no third class of ambiguous or indeterminate. Since no country could legally claim her, her parents were becoming U.S. citizens, and she was born on U.S. soil, she is a natural born citizen."
Not true. Please review the documents. Kamala Harris was born a citizen to both India and Jamaica in 1964. The parents were not "becoming" US citizens in 1964; In fact, available documents refute that claim, as Kamala's father initiated naturalization much later, in 1976.
"If a case is brought the courts arguing otherwise it will lose."
There is no court which has heard this case on its own merits, instead they deflected the issue by arguing a lack of "standing"
"This is a losing strategy that will only make conservatives look bad."
Perhaps. But it is the truth.
She has a US passport at this point, hard to revisit whether she was in the US illegally or not. I do think it has been established elsewhere that her parents were here illegally, that Kamala is an anchor baby, neither of her parents were US citizens, so therefore Kamala is not a natural born citizen. Unfortunately, no one has standing Apparently to challenge whether she is legally able to assume the office of president.
The following is from Chapter 2 of the Constitution of Jamaica,
A person born in Jamaica after August 5, 1962, or born outside Jamaica after that date to a parent who is a Jamaican citizen, is automatically considered a Jamaican citizen at birth. Furthermore, under current Jamaican legislation, citizens of Jamaica can hold multiple nationalities. And this status does not prohibit serving in the legislature of Jamaica. It is inconceivable to me that the intent of the framers of Article II would have been to allow such a thing for POTUS or VPOTUS.
Harris was born in Oakland, CA, on Oct. 20, 1964, and her father was a citizen of Jamaica at the time of her birth. Therefore, the law of Jamaica is clear: Kamala Harris is a citizen of Jamaica, pursuant to Section 3Cb of the Constitution of Jamaica. This law is very similar to the US Immigration and Naturalization Act with regard to children born to US citizens outsider of the boundaries of the US or it’s territories.
Wong Kim Ark was the subject of an 1898 SCOTUS ruling involving citizenship. The court held that Wong Kim Ark was a CITIZEN (not a natural born one) by virtue of the 14th amendment, noting that his Chinese citizen parents were lawfully resident within the US at the time of his birth, and completely self supporting.
The 14th amendment was ratified in 1868. It did not exist at the time that Article II was ratified in 1787. The 14th amendment does NOT refer to, or alter the meaning of Article II in ANY way, whatever one thinks that the framers meant for Article II to accomplish.
Harris’s birth status is identical to Wong Kim Ark. She was born in CA to two lawfully resident non citizen parents. She is NOT an Article II eligible Natural Born Citizen. She is a citizen at birth by virtue of the 14th amendment. I believe that Indian and Jamaican law make her a citizen of their countries too, as does US law under the Immigration and Naturalization Act which makes a person born to ANY US citizen ANYWHERE in the world a US citizen too.
It strains credulity to think that the framers of Article II, section one, clause 5 in 1787, INTENDED that at any time in the future, absent an amendment to allow for same, that a foreign citizen by birth would be eligible for the office of POTUS and VPOTUS.
None of the framers or founders were NBC. Most of them were born British subjects. They had to establish a grandfather clause by way of Article II, Section one, clause 5 to qualify themselves for the office of POTUS.
Our citizenship laws are similar to theirs. Our laws no more invalidate theirs then theirs do ours. It is a well recognized and mutually accepted international principle to allow mutual recognition for such laws.
How is the anchor baby Commie-La more “privileged” then the framers were, who were most of them born as British subjects?
Our overlords have decided that this is not an issue worth examining by adjudication. Constitutionalists know that the NBC requirement is designed to protect the office of POTUS from undue foreign influence, particularly from a father owing allegiance to a foreign sovereignty, and it is worth observing, especially against an Anti-American opportunist like Harris.
I see no downside in attempting, no matter how forlorn the hope, to have this matter adjudicated by SCOTUS. No constitutional provision should be regarded as optional.
At least in Obamas case, one of his parents was a US citizen.
No, they weren't.
They were here on student visas, and were not permanent resident aliens (held a green card) for at least five years before qualifying to apply for citizenship.
There is no legal way that they were "becoming US citizens."
-PJ
All US a passport requires is a US birth certificate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.