Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Accidentally Find a 'Very Exciting' Unique Exoplanet Has More Water Than Earth
Newsweek via MSN ^ | 28 Jul 2021 | Ed Brown

Posted on 07/29/2021 8:39:44 PM PDT by blueplum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: blueplum
Let's start building the invasion force to conquer their planet and steal their water.

Why wait for them to come here like all of our sci-fi novels predict?

-PJ

41 posted on 07/29/2021 10:23:23 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Oh indeed. When cars were invented there were people who said it is impossible for man to go faster than riding a horse. I like to think of it like an airplane. Once inside, you can travel at many times the speed of sound without noticing it because you are traveling at the same speed as the craft. So theoretically it is not impossible to build an environment that could travel at the speed of light. Technologically speaking, I’d say near impossible but could not rule it out entirely assuming the human race lives long enough to develop it. Not, imo, in anyone who is currently living to find out. Maybe in 3000 years someone will read this thread via mind meld - but then it wouldn’t matter if they did :-)

Frankly I’d say it is more realistic to think that we humans could someday copy and paste ourselves into a computer, at which point we could travel the universe indefinitely, and colonize other galaxies as some form of AI/Bot. After which, the primates would take over and evolve. Though that’s my wife’s obsession with Ancient Aliens rubbing off on me.


42 posted on 07/29/2021 10:29:20 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Moreover, at 50 light years, the person in the craft would age 50 years to get there. That’s basically an entire adult lifetime inside an artificial spacecraft. You’d have to make the environment such that 2nd and 3rd generations would be the ones who land on the planet. From a moral perspective, that’s tantamount to slavery. The persons born on the craft would be, without free will, indentured servants of those who planned the mission.

Not to mention, there is no turning back. One light year is almost 700,000 earth years. Just travel for a fraction of the time, when you return to earth everyone you knew will be dust. So may the planet.


43 posted on 07/29/2021 10:37:10 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Glad to see you back.


44 posted on 07/29/2021 10:48:45 PM PDT by doorgunner69 ("Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.." -Joseph Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nu2_Lupi

Planet “b”: Mass: 4.6 x Earth; Diameter: 1.48 x Earth; Orbit: 11.5 days

Planet “c”: Mass: 11.3 x Earth; Diameter: 2.6 x Earth; Orbit: 27.6 days

Planet “d”: Mass: 8.8 x Earth; Diameter: 2.6 x Earth; Orbit: 107.3 days

And a “G” main sequence star, too; not one of the much, much more common and dimmer “Red Dwarf” stars. All three planets orbit within 0.5 AU and are likely too hot to maintain liquid water.

Focus of the article is Planet “d” because of its longer orbit period and the possible presence of water in detectable quantities. Water or water vapor? Maybe not a Super Earth, but a Super Venus?

With a mass 8.8 times that of Earth and a diameter 2.6 larger, humans could live under Planet d’s gravity which would be about 1.3 times that of Earth.

https://www.azcalculator.com/calc/surface-gravity-calculator.php


45 posted on 07/29/2021 10:55:23 PM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

And unless there is something consumable in the water, this exciting discovery is worthless. Not even Culligan will go that far.

wy69


46 posted on 07/29/2021 11:01:18 PM PDT by whitney69 (uin )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

The distance to Mars is miles, not light years.

One light year = @ 6 trillion miles.

Alpha Centari, the nearest star to Earth is about 4.3 light years away. At current estimated best speeds for an interplanetary ship, one way travel time is estimated at 19,000 Earth years.

The star in the article is @ 50 light years away; so 221,000 voyage years?

Nope. We are just going to have to come up with faster-than-light (FTL) drive somehow.

Somehow.

Yeah.


47 posted on 07/29/2021 11:24:33 PM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

Yeah whales, dolphins, seals, walruses, narwhals, dugongs, otters, polar bears, and beavers have a real hard time in aquatic habitats.


48 posted on 07/29/2021 11:24:34 PM PDT by webheart (Free of mask, free of mask! Great God almighty.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arcadian Empire

Nu2 Lupi d


49 posted on 07/29/2021 11:26:15 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

We’re supposed to stay away from Europa The black monolith said so


50 posted on 07/29/2021 11:31:08 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

#7. Let’s call this exoplanet “Waterworld II”.

Mars is about 42 million miles from Earth and can come as close as 38 million.

Just a day-tripper voyage compared to reaching the nearest star system of Alpha Centauri. (You’re gonna need one helluva bigger ship to get there and back).


51 posted on 07/29/2021 11:58:25 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lee martell
Mars is at least what? Some 238 MILLION Light Years away from earth

Whoa. That's a long way away.

52 posted on 07/30/2021 12:04:17 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vigilante2
Mars isn’t 238 million light years away

Trillion.

238 trillion light years away.

53 posted on 07/30/2021 12:05:05 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler
Earth to mars distance is 238 million MILES (not light years).

I heard eleventy-skadillion light years.

54 posted on 07/30/2021 12:06:03 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Like you Laz, I failed a lot of math classes. /sarc but true


55 posted on 07/30/2021 12:26:15 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao
"Closer to its sun than Venus. It would be hot 2 1/2 times Earth mass would mean 100 pounds here would be 250 pounds there."

100 pounds here would be 140 pounds there. The radius is 2.5 earth radius but the mass is 8.8 times earth's. You need to multiply by 8.8 then divide by the square of 2.5 to make the conversion. That gives you the 1.4 conversion factor.

56 posted on 07/30/2021 12:39:37 AM PDT by Neanderthal (The Devil walks with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Colt1851Navy

Or Toad Suck Ferry, Arkansas?


57 posted on 07/30/2021 1:48:42 AM PDT by .44 Special (Taimid Buacharch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Congress can spend several trillion dollars a year. Why don’t they just pass a law saying we can travel a trillion miles a year?


58 posted on 07/30/2021 1:56:20 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

Actually, at 8.8 times the mass, 100 lbs would be 880 lbs.


59 posted on 07/30/2021 4:18:05 AM PDT by dereknunley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

wtf are you talking about lol. Mars isn’t a million light years away lol


60 posted on 07/30/2021 4:22:27 AM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson