Posted on 07/26/2021 6:46:05 AM PDT by ransomnote
Your title says ‘deadly blood clots’ are forming. If they are ‘deadly blood clots’ and they are forming in 62% of the vaccinated then one would expect they would be dropping like flies, 30 or 50 or 62% of them. Otherwise they aren’t particularly deadly, are they?
Thank you for doing the work to get this truth out. The great reset has a tagalong of mass murder on a scale never iagined in History of humanity. Albeit a slow death program, meant to hide the truth that the killing was planned and instituted under the guise of saving us from a nearly innocuous virus released upon the world. The proof of this planned murdering is the strenuous effort and media propaganda to prevent people from using HCQ and or Ivermectin to treat the virus early and successfully. The murdering uses the jabs (these are not vacines), knowing the killing will be distributed over a time span which gives ‘plausible deniability’ via media propaganda.
~~~~~~~~~
Good post. I wish I had your gift for vigorous, concise writing.
I think the phase I bioweapon, Corona Virus, and the phase II bioweapon, the ‘vaccine’, were designed to cover their tracks by both utilizing spike proteins. They shift all blame from ‘vaccine damage’ to Covid-19. The vaccinated can shed spike proteins which sicken the unvaccinated, but that damage will be attributed to Covid-19 (claim they were asymptomatic). Even deaths resulting from ‘vaccination’ are called Covid-19 deaths - that wouldn’t be possible if the impacts of the two phases were dissimilar.
Your title says ‘deadly blood clots’ are forming. If they are ‘deadly blood clots’ and they are forming in 62% of the vaccinated then one would expect they would be dropping like flies, 30 or 50 or 62% of them. Otherwise they aren’t particularly deadly, are they?
~~~~~~~~~~
It’s not my title. FR specifies that you use the title the writer/author gives content so that someone thinking about posting a video or article can search FR reliably to see if it’s already posted.
You’re thinking your refusal to read anything beyond the title is my fault, perhaps?
Your title says ‘deadly blood clots’ are forming. If they are ‘deadly blood clots’ and they are forming in 62% of the vaccinated then one would expect they would be dropping like flies, 30 or 50 or 62% of them. Otherwise they aren’t particularly deadly, are they?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Actually, your entire post is false. I just saw your complaint about the the title and responded to that.
But over my lifetime I’ve seen ‘deadly’ used this way without it requiring ‘dropping like flies’ large percentages to happen TODAY. Unfortunately, the medical evidence Dr. Hoffe has collected indicates that too many will start dying once their hearts can no longer pump blood past the spike-protein damaged capillaries.
Maybe the difference between deadly and fatal?
As in, playing with gasoline and matches can be deadly.
As opposed to ....he’s dead, Jim. (Fatal.)
If most people who've had CV19 vaccine haven't taken D-Dimer test, then what is 62% figure based on? What did I overlook?
Did you read the notes at the top of the thread. Explanation is there.
"In the studies of rats, and in the studies of ferrets or other animals. The vast majority of them developed blood clots and then died within a few months. In humans they estimate it will take a few years because we are a lot tougher."
The problem with animal testing is that humans don't necessarily react to things the same way that animals do. Chocolate, for example, can make a dog sick, or even kill it.
Chocolate Poisoning in Dogs
Metabolic differences between species are not a good comparison to damaged lungs as such damage causes the heart to work harder regardless of rat/human etc. The Dr. does acknowledge the difference between mammal species reaction to lung damage by noting the rats, ferrets etc. often died within a few months if blood clots developed, and by contrast humans are expected to endure longer.
Maybe the difference between deadly and fatal?
As in, playing with gasoline and matches can be deadly.
As opposed to ....he’s dead, Jim. (Fatal.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ah. Thank you for saying it more clearly than I could. Yes. I read it the way you explained it - the title didn’t say they died. Asbestos and cyanide are said to be deadly in some contexts; that was the one that came to my mind.
there is a window between now (7 months into the vaccination program) and maybe another 2-3 years when it is going to be impossible to avoid public recognition of any mid-to long-term side effects where we will likely be in a mandatory vaccination environment.
While i would quite happily refuse to comply, I have responsibilities which would not be met and are important, so I look for a plan b
basically, what medication or combination of medications would minimize the impact of the mrna vaccine, e.g. infection-level dosage of ivermectin for x days?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.