Jordan Peterson Doesn't Understand Climate Change?

Aime Maggie ^ | Feb 20, 2021 | Aime Maggie

[BenLurkin]

Welcome to FreeRepublic.

I think there’s posting guidelines around her somewhere.

[FroedrickVonFreepenstein]

You joined today just to post this crap?

[BenLurkin]

Around here somewhere.

[Paladin2]

She’s a nut, Jim.

She’s a very superficial thinker and has NO understanding of the Science nor the situation.

[Prince of Space]

Ibtz!

[headsonpikes]

Well, unlike some, he knows enough to come in out of the rain.

[Lurkinanloomin]

I feel she makes a lot of good points? Was very surprising. I felt well informed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We get how you feel, what do you think?

[Chad C. Mulligan]

LOL!

[Lurkinanloomin]

I listened to the first couple of minutes and she said their is no debate about climate change.

She is an indoctrinated idiot, not worth any more of my time.

You are on the wrong website.

[Lurkinanloomin]

There is no debate about climate change, just believe the propaganda and do what you’re told.

[Dr. Sivana]

When your first post is to promote a pro-perversion (rainbow flag on wall), new-age/occult (posters) who uses the word “intersectionality” in her FIRST sentence, it behooves you to use a more detailed explanation that this is not a waste of time than “I think”.

[goodnesswins]

Are you really Aime Maggie? First day here and you post THIS?

[ALPAPilot]

The scientific method is an empirical method of acquiring knowledge that has characterized the development of science since at least the 17th century. It involves careful observation, applying rigorous skepticism about what is observed, given that cognitive assumptions can distort how one interprets the observation. It involves formulating hypotheses, via induction, based on such observations; experimental and measurement-based testing of deductions drawn from the hypotheses; and refinement (or elimination) of the hypotheses based on the experimental findings. These are principles of the scientific method, as distinguished from a definitive series of steps applicable to all scientific enterprises.

λόγος

look it up

[GOPJ]

Predictions about climate change have been made for the past 30 years. Can YOU name one that came true... Just one would be fine.

[Sidebar Moderator]

Kiss your ass goodbye, troll.

[twogunpete]

Yep... I have no idea what Jordan Peterson thinks of climate change, nor do I care since he is a psychologist.

I however am an environmental scientist and I could tell within a couple of minutes that she has little to no understanding of the issues.

[Sidebar Moderator]

ZOT!

[PGR88]

I actually listed to the whole thing. Is this a freshman high school project??

Her arguments and reasoning are childish. There in fact are few arguments. This is just string of fashionable green cliches and gross generalizations.

I knew we were in trouble when she said: “y’all who disagree just need to shut the f*** up.” Classy!

Her comments about nuclear were probably most measured and even contained some basic facts.

“He is just wrong about climate change. Nearly all scientists agree with it….and why would scientists lie?”

“If you do any tiny little minuscule research about shifting to a green energy economy, its actually going to wind up saving money - its just facts! Hands down… I’ll sign with my blood.”

“In college my group talked about climate change. Not whether it existed, because we all have brains.”

What a waste of time…..

[Sapwolf]

Why is this posted here?

Climate Change is normal, not some malignant killer that’s going to get us.

It is NATURE.