You say that like its a bad thing.
Say rather an 'anti-covid vaxxer', though. Your outdated and irrelevant shaming label doesn't work here.
Posted on 04/09/2021 2:09:56 PM PDT by ransomnote
Yes. that is exactly what will happen. If people are paying attention, you already hear a little of what you described as to who will be blamed. The groundwork is already quietly in place and being implemented. It is subtle, but that is how it starts.
Injection of messengerRNA, a synthetic RNA (if you don’t know what this means and why it has to be injected not oral into PH2 stomach acid) into children who have yet to procreate and have their own children— would highly likely affect their ability TO have children. This is under question, and being massively “debunked” in the shaming drive of social media and others. But it IS a valid area of knowledge about synthetic mRNA and the potential “unforeseen” developments, known to professional investigators. An undercurrent of Margaret Sanger eugenics (imho) is detectable in the senior people promoting this- and immense profits, already booked with OUR money with minimal out of pocket investment money in private PHarma. The recent idiotic “shaming” effort of Zuckerwanker at farce buch is a major moron’s complicity in this... push.
Geneticists/biochemists and real, true immunologists know this is screwing around (bad pun, but true) with the FERTILITY of any pubescent genetics, and the world population of Intelligent (or otherwise better intellect worker bees) dominant populations being manipulated. Question the science, demand the science— don’t wrap up the science in “marketing” tricks. Learn.
As to Dr. Yeadon- retired pfizer execs, MD/PHDs have a non-disclosure for a period of time, so he is free to comment professionally after 5 years or so, and assuredly THEY Pfizer are working hard to trash a professional reputation and expertise (the comments are agreed upon by several major current experts, as in— at Johns Hopkins in direct contention with CDC “gubmint” bureaucrat paid liars. Remember Orwell.) trashing him to control the blowback to a NON-FDA approved “prevention/treatment”.
The profit upside on each compensated injection given is quite large (one reason Merck has backed out of this particular gambit- because they have Therapeutics in Phase III and IV investigation for anti-viral treatment, and because their own research revealed that any “vaccine” they would make could not 1.) be a preventive vaccine and 2.)would not surpass the immunity gained by getting covid, surviving it and having antibodies generated by natural means to the specific virus— the weaponized chi-com SARS COV-19 coronavirus. See the Merck corporate statement on this- very clear.
To the extent that gubmint has liability (which, in the case of private PHARMA- there is complete WAIVER of medico-legal liability under the Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA/gubmint- thus providing the impetus and extended POWER to FORCE citizens to have the injections) this is on a whole other level & the cover up of the negative reactions/deaths is NOT a facet of anti-vaxxers point of view, which is anti-science if truly anti-vax.
It is the reality of DATA that is being suppressed, for an implied public “good”, with complicit “partners” (media, govt as currently controlled by same, and Pharma megabucks banked in Switzerland) in this worldwide effort. Dare one say Globalists? A long way from Salk polio vaccine, and other well-defined vaccines that... work, and are proven.
The SPARS time line is in line with the current effort. Johns Hopkins people know this- trying to get this out. The public is being manipulated by public private cooperations and the liability lawyers who support... the DEMONRAT party to a fault. Odd- since they stand to make much more money by contending the forced medical treatment unapproved.
Urge all and sundry to go back to the Dr.Seheult MedCram continuing education for physicians for a description of the known then, and now mechanism of infection of coronaviruses (this mechanism includes covid, and thus the need for the rumours of “new variants” of S-Protein mutants/or redesigned weaponized. To push the “vaccines” wider age ranges).
MedCram is NOT anti-vax, but IS peer-reviewed science. Worth the time (even for non-professionals, there is understanding in relating the information.... to both clinicians and not)
MedCram #59 from April 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM2A2xNLWR4
MedCram # from 3 months ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LXZTU9UbSc
And 2 WEEKS ago re: the variants and “immune memory”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aOMs1loXN0
You say that like its a bad thing.
Say rather an 'anti-covid vaxxer', though. Your outdated and irrelevant shaming label doesn't work here.
Very well done.
bagster wrote: “You say that like its a bad thing.”
So, you think killing 90% of the world’s population is a good thing?
bagster wrote: “Say rather an ‘anti-covid vaxxer’, though. Your outdated and irrelevant shaming label doesn’t work here.”
‘Anti-vaxxer’ is a good label.
John S Mosby wrote: “MedCram is NOT anti-vax, but IS peer-reviewed science. Worth the time (even for non-professionals, there is understanding in relating the information.... to both clinicians and not)”
Any poster who relies upon youtube videos isn’t following the science. Let’s see some real science as published in reputable, peer reviewed, medical journals.
bttt
DugwayDuke to ransomnote
ransomnote wrote: “Yeadon is not anti-vaxxer; he’s an industry expert with 30 years of exemplary work. Details are in the Forbes.com article that I linked, but you won’t read.”
Oh, I read that article and that should be apparent from the quotes I posted from your article.
““That’s what I would do if I wanted to get rid of 90 or 95% of the world’s population. And I think that’s what they’re doing.””
Anyone who thinks these vaccines are a method to kill 90% of the worlds population is an anti-vaxxer.
Oh, and one other thing. Yeadon pretty well demolishes the Bossche claims that have been so popular with the anti-vaxxer cult in this forum.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh, I can ignore your ‘reasoning’ because it’s profoundly biased. Anti-vaxx has meant, until you became ‘creative’, objection to vaccinations on principle. Yeadon is only objecting to the obviously malevolent vaccine push regarding Covid019.
Yeadon and Bossche don’t agree - remember when experts were allowed to disagree. That was way before Fauci/MSM laid down the party line and deleted/purged/fired/ostracized people who didn’t agree.
Disagreement is healthy. I’ve talked with people who agree with Yeadon and those who agree with Bossche. See? People can HAVE separate opinions and allow us to read them and then decide for ourselves.
Re: 28
Typcially (and I am not always the best at following), you ping someone that you mentions in am post. So I will do it for you.
I know its Saturday and all but did you have to start happy hour without me? Read your post and see if you can understand it. I can’t. But then I’m still sober. 😆
LOL! Woah - my apologies.
So:
Typically (and I am not always the best at following), you ping someone that you mention in a post. So I will do it for you.
So how many martoonis have you had today? Drinking on the job could lead to termination. 😉
It’s OK i’m used to rudeness from this crowd but thank you. Some comments and threads should not be dignified with a reply
Never quite liked a martini. And no drinking at work - yet!
Only one thing really matters to the democrats now. eliminating the 2nd amendment. Sooo. Stack the SCOTUS. Write some EOs to ban all firearms, eventually. And each EO is declared law.
Turn them in Mr. and Mrs. American - Dianne Feinstein.
You know the guys you work for view termination in a whole nother way than IBM does right? 🤔
Once med beds are released, it won't be an issue. Good as new in 15 minutes flat. Or something like that
Yeh, I don’t think they cure gunshot to the head but...😉
Listen, FRiend- am not RELYING on youtube— this is ONE of the platforms which MedCram (a certified Continuing Medical Education channel on youtube and other platforms). MedCram is certified in the United States by the ACCCME and AOA.
In the United States, CME for physicians is regulated by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) and the American Osteopathic Association (AOA). MedCram is CME for physicians, FRiend. Perhaps you do not understand this, and this “poster” does not professionally or personally “rely” on youtube, but on the peer-reviewed scientific trials and publications of the profession.
MedCram is pointedly NOT anti-Vax, it could not be and still be accredited for CME. Do you understand? The point was these are easy to follow video CME programs EVEN for the uneducated non-professionals, which are extremely helpful in clinical understanding of this disease mechanism of infection and in prevention of infection.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.