Number of COVID vaccine injuries reported to VAERS surpasses 50,000, CDC data show

Children's Defense Fund via NOQ Report ^ | 04/05/2021

[RC one]

but it did not make the case that the coronavirus has evolved a more resilient lipid bilayer because it was in bats.

Here are a couple of things that caught my eye and raised my curiosity regarding the high temperature of inactivation seen in Covid 19.

“This article” link is dead.

Yes it is.

This Article. It's an article about the inhibitory effect of HCQ on the first Sars Covid virus.

If rates did not slow as much as expected in warm summer months, as you predicted it only tends to confirm that fomite transmission is not significant in transmission of Covid-19.

Rates slowed but not like we see with influenza. The role of fomites is one of many unanswered questions along with the question of oral transmission. I assumed that fomite transmission risk is significant because I assumed that this is a perfect biological weapon. I assumed that since I was expected to work around it all day long in an ER and assuming anything different could turn into a fatal error in judgement.

[BDParrish]

Thanks!
I was very curious about the whole business of using metal ionophores in cancer therapy. Zinc is interesting because it signals apoptosis in some cells but not in others so there might be some potential there for cancer therapy. CQ could get the zinc in the cells but it just turned out to act like a poison, so I think that whole line of attack has been shelved for now. The idea of using it for viruses seems promising. Some were wanting to use it on HIV and that did not pan out, not sure why. About a year ago, I was on FR with a couple of doctors, wastoute especially, who said the same thing as you, that HCQ was not the life-saver in the ER that we wanted it to be. He would always deflect the discussion with references to homeopathics and chelation therapy and other clinical failures, but finally when I got him to understand that there was a basis for this HCQ hypothesis, his response was zinc homeostasis. You will remember all the talk then about early intervention and zinc supplements etc. He got mad over people asking him to watch that MedCram video and quit the forum, so I cannot ask him anything now. It seems to me that there are lines of valuable inquiry here with this stuff. You?

Thank you for your thoughts about bats, that is and will continue to be an interesting read. Obviously this virus is not straight from the bats so it seems plausible that there could be deliberate manipulation but HOW did they do it? They would have to have a technology way more advanced than what we have. We had better get over there in the middle of the night and steal that from them! You can’t snip and substitute RNA like you can with DNA, and exDemMom suggested that they could have engineered a DNA sequence to produce the RNA they wanted but that would leave footprints all over it, never mind the technical sophistication required.

Anything you have will be interesting, and thanks again RC.

[Jane Long]

I work in the ER.

---

Really? In what capacity? And, what, exactly, is your medical training level?

Or, maybe you answer the phones? Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Just curious what your medical training is, to be offering so much China virus vax “stats/facts” and probable “diagnoses” of those vax’d, who’ve likely succumbed to these experimental agents.

[RC one]

Why do you keep talking to me?

[Jane Long]

Simple. I’ve explained it, before....

Because you keep giving “expert” advice/statements/probable diagnoses, so I think it’s important for all to know your EXACT LEVEL OF MEDICAL training and expertise.

[RC one]

I think you're just fishing for personal information so you can take your flame war to another level. You too offer medical advice all the freaking time (and bad medical advice at that). I don't ask you to provide your educational background or anything that could be used to identify you in the real world. The fact is, you're stalking me on this forum and I'm doing my level best to ignore you. You are clearly jumping threads and engaging in a senseless flame war and you are thereby violating the do's and don'ts of free republic.

So, now that we have established that, I'm going to go back to ignoring you.

[SecAmndmt]

I don’t want your personal info, your hospital, your license, your address etc.

Why do you think that only people with medical training get to discuss health and wellness? Perhaps you have America confused with another country?

Conventional allopathic medicine never had a monopoly on health, and even less so given their incredible neglect in hospitals and nursing homes, and non-support for early home treatment.

[RC one]

Obviously this virus is not straight from the bats so it seems plausible that there could be deliberate manipulation but HOW did they do it? They would have to have a technology way more advanced than what we have.

Coronavirus may have been a 'cell-culture experiment' gone wrong

You tube video of Professor Nikolai Petrovsky discussing the possibility of lab origin

And let's not forgot this:

SARS escaped Beijing lab twice

And the mysterious Furin Cleavage site:

The virus does have an inexplicable feature: a so-called “furin cleavage site” in the spike protein that helps SARS-CoV-2 pry its way into human cells. While such sites are present in some coronaviruses, they haven’t been found in any of SARS-CoV-2’s closest known relatives. “We don’t know where the furin site came from,” says Susan Weiss, a microbiologist who co-directs the Penn Center for Research on Coronaviruses and Other Emerging Pathogens at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine. “It’s a mystery.”

Massive coincidence? Study says coronavirus adapted too quickly to humans, raises questions on its origin Experts found that Covid-19 bound tightest to human cells than any other species tested. This is either a massive coincidence or Covid-19 has somehow, in the past, been adapted for human cells.

[RC one]

I clearly wasn’t “talking” to you.

[Jane Long]

....I don’t ask you to provide your educational background or anything that could be used to identify you in the real world.....

---

I have asked this particular FRequent vax pusher....who has mentioned on NUMEROUS threads about his NUMEROUS vax advice, probable conditions that caused deaths....as they just couldn’t be caused from these ‘vax’s’...as well as touting how he/she is a ‘vaxing machine’....just .what exactly his level of medical expertise is, with all of the repeated vax stats, advice, advocating, diagnoses, etc, that s/he makes, with 90++% of his/her posts.

He refuses to answer.

I’ve never asked for any information that would ID him/her, in the ‘real world’. Nor, would I.

Funny that s/he cannot answer with a simple....I am a trained and licensed Medical Doctor, or, I am a virologist, or I am on the staff of CDC.....etc.

Nada.

🤷‍♀️

[SecAmndmt]

You people (vax pushers of unknown background) have asked for our “credentials” numerous times.

I will continue to engage you in any scamdemic thread where I find you, whether you like it or not.

[BDParrish]

Thanks RC!
I see now that the words “lab leak” and “engineered virus” are fungible terms, and in themselves are not enlightening either pro or con. The perspective of Petrovsky reported by Ch. Schmidt’s March 17th Medscape article is, IMHO, unremarkable and requires no magical thinking, nor suspicion of nefarious motives.

Throughout the article however Schmidt uses the term “engineered” meaning sometimes the idea that there is secret magical gene-splicing technology, and other times meaning that at Wuhan lab they were dumping stuff into petri dishes and saying, “Hey Yang, come look at this!”