TOO EASY.
C'mon Man!
Posted on 03/05/2021 2:11:00 PM PST by Ennis85
+1
Apologies, let me state that clearer, Bob is just pointing out the hypocrisy of posters who support same-sex fetishes and the right king of political enablers if he or she happen to be Republicans.
“Bob is saying same sex fetishes by republicans good—— same sex-fetishes by democrats bad.”
LOL. But I did say that I could tolerate Grenell, as long as he didn’t shove Carnival Acts in front of the country. But now Grenell is out there supporting these acts.
Ps 15:4
4 In whose eyes a vile person is contemned; but he honoureth them that fear the LORD. He that sweareth to his own hurt, and changeth not.
“He has been doing this since Trump pushed/appointed him, that was his mission. Started railing against nations who criminalized homosexuality and pissed off a lot of diplomats because of his antics promoting his fetish.”
Yea, I remember that. I didn’t care much for those countries to begin with, so I didn’t care about what he was doing.
We believe in Equal Rights while the Left believes in Special Rights.
We believe in Equality while the Left believes in Equity.
If I was able to start my own Political movement it would be called the “Get Off My Lawn Party”.
right king of political enablers??
sumthin lost in translation
Same sex fetishes by anyone is bad. Just read your bible to see that it is so.
“Mr. Grenell. God made laws against homosexuality. Try following them.”
Good advice. I support Grenell in fighting the Deep State. I oppose him insofar as he pushes the homosexual/lesbian agenda.
We shouldn’t have to turn our nation into a moral sewer to save it.
I am listening to the daily podcast called “The Bible in a Year”. It will be interesting to hear many of the parts that are not usually (ever? )included in the readings in church.
I had a recent insight about this.
I sat at lunch with my pastor, very cool guy who runs The Point church in San Jose. I had recently written an internet article “How to Preach the Gospel Without Mentioning Sin.” He agreed with it.
His most recent set of sermons had touched on almost this exact topic but he didn’t mention it. I asked him why.
“Because if I bring that up, I lose my job as a pastor.”
It was eye opening. Pastors cannot touch controversial subjects because it generates invective on both sides. If you bring up another controversial subject, then there’s another set of both sides. Eventually the both sides agree that you gotta go. So pastors do not address controversial subjects.
It’s bullshiite. I was going to church to learn everything I could about both sides of arguments in christendom, but I did not realize that this principle was in place and that I was being fed pablum.
I have half a mind to start the Church of the Controversial Christ, Christ the Radical.
Let the Truth come out. It is better than the bullshiite people have been fed for a long time.
Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy you won’t hear preached. If you are interested in the printed version of a bible in a year https://www.oneyearbibleblog.com is my daily hang out (outside of Free Republic) for the past 20 years.
?????
What the hell are you talking about!!!
TOO EASY.
C'mon Man!
Thank you. I’ve saved this link.
Very interesting
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.