I am so glad he did not get on the SCOTUS and hope he never does.
“Welcome to The White House! How can I help you?”
....Me and my group are here to Burn It All Down, Man!
“I see. Do you have an appointment? We are about to close.
....Yes, Our ‘appointment’ is with Uncle Sam, at 1pm.
Oh. In that case, the Walking Tour begins right through these doors. No gum chewing allowed.
Enjoy your scheduled trip to The White House. Too-Da-Loo!”
He is: Leftarded.
We should be thanking Mitch McConnell for keeping this guy off the Supreme Court. He’s no “moderate.” He’s a typical leftie judge who would have fit right in with the SCOTUS libs.
a LISP program is more intelligent than this
wacko who apparently belongs with the child eating,
rape-protecting, election stealing conspiring
monsters in POTUS (excluding the Honorable Justice Thomas).
WTF? USG definition of terrorism.
The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations defines terrorism as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85).
This is head of a US circuit court of appeals that deals in terrorism cases that does not understand this definition and deliberates the laws? And they want him to be making judgements on who gets prosecuted under those laws? It is a good thing that this entitled wisenheimer was not placed on SCOTUS.
Inconceivable. Shocked, shocked, I say. /sarc
We waited for justice from Sessions, Barr and Durham for four long painful years, holding back. We were betrayed.
Now the the new AG and the enemies of freedom will label us all domestic terrorists and destroy us if they can. Working quickly and decisively with the full House,Senate,President and judges on their side. Fast, efficient work against us.
This is like after the Oklahoma City bombing, where the Janet Reno types inhibited all of us into total meek silence to avoid being called bomber-apologists or something.
My own definition, which is about the same as the statutory definition, is the use of violence or threats of violence in attempt to disrupt the democratic processes. So an attack on a courthouse, while in operation, trying to prevent judges from actually deciding cases, that plainly is domestic terrorism.So forget the working hours stuff. What Garland is really saying is that he's agreed to perpetuate the insurrection garbage in return for becoming Attorney General of the United States. That should be the basis for the Republicans to pound him and, by extension, the entire RAT party, in further questioning.
I wonder how he’d feel about a group of militia members occupying an empty wildlife refuge out in the middle of nowhere in Oregon in the middle of January.
All democrats are the enemy, folks.
My own definition, which is about the same as the statutory definition, is the use of violence or threats of violence in attempt to disrupt the democratic processes.
It doesn't matter what he thinks the laws says.
And this was the man in line for SCOTUS!?
The comedy writes itself with this bunch.
He discriminates against poor janitors on the night shift.
Chilling to think of him as AG and what that is going to mean for the rule of law...
Good to know that we have those ferocious GOP senators protecting our freedom & liberties against the likes of Garland...
Oh, wait..
So 9/11 wasn’t terrorism and neither was the Boston Marathon bombing. Riiiiight.
What a POS.
Many years ago had to undergo this same crap in the military. Thankfully, most of us managed to under the damage and increase in negative thoughts about things after being separated from the idiots (with no useful purpose in life) that lectured us. Oh well, during that time, we actually experienced the feeling of feeling superior to the useless fools standing in front of us.
What BS...would I can set fire to a government building if the federal government is close and not be charged? Or is it only for BLM/Antics morons?
Yep. He’s an idiot.
So if the federal building in Oklahoma City had been blown up at 4:00 am, it would not be a terrorist attack?