Not sure I like this..
—
This, is as you suspect, is among the worst ideas ever promoted. It would lead directly to an official one party state with one leader for life and repression would be off the scale. A mirror image of how China is run by the CCP - by and for the CCP, with all others expendable.
What a load of nonsense.
You should be ashamed for posting this and even more ashamed for buying it.
Paultards gonna tard I guess.
This can only work if we are all under the rule of law. We are not. Currently, we have an illegally and illegitimately imposed hierarchy that does not recognize a single legal system. They are immune from the laws they themselves have instituted. COS will work, but not now. Maybe it is too late anyway.
Such an action would give aid and comfort to the enemy. The Constitution has a word for what the Parler's new CEO is advocating.
I wouldn’t put it past the RATs to use an issue to get it started then re-direct to hammer\adios the 2nd amendment...
Isn’t Dan Bongino involved with Parler? Does he agree with this?
It would have to be a majority of states to ratify the amendments. No way are there that many communist blue states. They could propose as many Marxist amendments as they wanted, Red states wouldn’t agree.
The people who wrote our constitution were learned men of letters and men of honor.
If there was a constitutional convention today it would taken over by the same morons who voted for Biden.
We would have a Facebook, Twitter convention.
No thanks. I’ll stick with the current constitution.
WTF???????
This is just someone’s silly opinions, lies, and distortion of the facts.
Hit piece.
Yeah, I’m sure that the new CEO of Parler wants George Soros to “Rewrite the Constitution”. I can’t get past the idiocy of that premise. What’s worse is that you have so many that immediately believe it.
This is fake news that’s been spouted for years. How would Soros control it ? Most assemblies in the country are controlled by Republicans, yeah I know they re bad too. The Convention would be used to bring about change for the Fed govt, the issues would be on the table, not the entire constitution. I would like to see another party that’s number 1 goal would be limited govt, that would fight against Fed overreach. Which means most of what the feds do would be eliminated.
Sounds like BS.
I call total BS on this article. It is written and promoted by those who wish to keep the status quo, things like term limits for Congress. Can anyone here imagine Mark Levin teaming up with George Soros? That idea has me laughing.
There is no mention in the article that any ratification of Constitutional Amendments 3/4 approval of the states. Article V can only create Amendments. It cannot re-write the Constitution.
If you’d like to educate yourself a bit, I’d recommend “The Liberty Amendments” by Mark Levin.
The makings of a misleading headline
“Parler’s New CEO Wants Convention That Would Let George Soros Rewrite The Constitution”
Thus, we can infer Dan Bongino supports George Soros rewriting the Constitution? I think not. Smell test failure.
Clickbait fake news.
and this illustrates my objection to these calls for Article V conventions to rewrite the constitution. Before we can rewrite the constitution we need to enforce the one we’ve got and that’s not happening. Not only that but how many george soros funded ‘patriots’ are going to fondle with the social contract that knits together this nation for all these years. This is NOT a good idea and it should be rejected out of hand.