Posted on 12/21/2020 3:10:47 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
BTW - I learned in my early youth not to bet. I was feeling my oats over my golf game at 18 years old. It only cost me 30 bucks and a large helping of humble pie for the life lesson.
Betting is for braggarts and fools.
I prefer to be right, and refrain from shooting my mouth off until I know I'm right.
Flogging the likes of you for 6 months during the 2016 FR primary wars was very satisfying - and so was the purge at the end of it. 
You are like an empty vessel the derps fill with their lies.
Doesn't that make you feel bad at all?
Priority number one for the derps. Attack the credibility of those accusing them of having done what they have done. This is their playbook and you suckers fall for it everytime. They are laughing at you.
Tell the truth, I'm embarrassed FOR you.
Oh Vanity, Where Is Thy Sting?
You actually sound schizoid nuts! It doesn't matter if it's in chat when it is just as deranged.
Seriously? Does that sound like something that would have 'documented proof' available to the public?
See, this is why you have no credibility. You have no idea how the real world works. Its as if I'm talking to a small, naive child.
You are vile.
So since there is no evidence of the Frankfurt raid you just simply believe because a con artist said it was true? That is the very definition of childish naivete. You so much want it to be true that you will believe any nonsense made up by Qtrolls.
I have read his Twitter feed and I can tell you as a software engineer with 35 years experience, with NSA, CIA, space shuttle software in my background, that Watkins is about as much of a security expert as Sponge Bob Squarepants.
You can’t even understand or read my posts. I said if Powell wins her case in court, I will give $1000 to FR. I am asking some of you Bigfoot chasers to pledge to give $1000 to FR if I am wrong. No money to me. Only to FR.
There is more evidence that it happened than it didn't happen. And Powell is not the only one saying it. Did you know that statements are evidence? You are the one making a claim without evidence.
you just simply believe because a con artist said it was true?
Calling someone a con artist does not make them a con artist. Especially if that someone has motive for discrediting the so-called 'con artist'.
you will believe any nonsense made up by Qtrolls.
Interestingly enough, this particular so called 'conspiracy theory' did not originate with Q. But dummies like you now associate any exposure of the derp state's shenanigans with Q in order to file it under 'conspiracy theory' and discredit the truth tellers.
Its a tale as old as time and I'm surprised you haven't caught on to it yet, being the so-called 'patriot' that you claim to be.
I do know I am right. Powell is a damaging embarrassment. Guiliani made it very clear today that she has no association with Trump at all. Watch in coming days as Trump and WH move any further away from her carnival sideshow.
The bottom line is, you are betting against Trump's success which is the same thing as betting against America's success and your own self interest.
Its different than just arguing against it. It shows a whole nother level of commitment to America's downfall.
Are you Chinese?
In post 124 said there is no documented evidence and now you say there is plenty of evidence. We have a phrase for you on the computer business — “random sentence generator.”
Your appeal to authority is not evidence of Codemonkey's expertise. It smacks of professional jealousy and emotion. Your words are wind.
You know nothing of the man or his level of skill.
I stand to gain nothing. But a truly patriotic website like FR stands to gain $1000 if I am wrong. I am not betting against Trump. I am betting against Powell. She is not on Trump’s side.
Go ahead and hitch your wagon to the star that is a porn website administrator in Japan.
Pretty sure I said no documented evidence available to the public. In fact, here is my exact quote:
Does that sound like something that would have 'documented proof' available to the public?
And I don't recall saying that there's 'plenty of evidence'. I said that Powell is not the only one saying this happened and that statements are evidence. See, this is an example of you seeing what you want to see. Of twisting words and facts to support your argument. In my neck of the woods we have a word for people like you.
"Homeboy's full of sh*t".
A quick illustration.
I say: "I just came from the woods and met a man who said he saw a tree fall down".
You say: "A tree didn't fall down and there is no evidence that it did".
In this scenario, I have evidence and you do not. And yet you feel free to opine as if your 'opinion' and 'emotion' is evidence.
You catching on yet?
Straightened that up for you. You need to work on your summarizing techniques.
Powell represents Trump's interests, if not Trump himself personally in the legal sense.
She also represents America and Trump supporters and voters and she is fighting in court for those interests.
You just admitted you are betting against her. Therefore, you are betting against Trump's, the people he represents, and America.
Its really a very simple formula to follow.
I question your logic and math skills. Follow the science.
“Let me say definitively that Sidney Powell is not part of our legal team, she hasn’t been for five weeks,” Giuliani said in an appearance on the right-wing cable channel Newsmax. “She is not a special counsel for the president, she does not speak for the president, nor does she speak for the administration. She speaks for herself.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.