Posted on 12/06/2020 9:12:34 AM PST by bitt
Probably because they managed to “fix” the ballots since Nov third.π€
I was in school, private school Ours had one of these dot reading computers for tests and the teacher would run her answer key through the machine before she graded our Scantron scored answers, and she would augment our test results based on how accurate the test key was to the actual result. This technology is crappy and has been for 30 years
Since no complete audit of ballots are done, the hand count would match the machine count.
Originally the tabulator was suspected of keeping vote count of a favored candidate ahead by a few percent. This was supposed to an incremental process. The vote stuffing and dumping could have proceeded without raising any suspicion.
However, if the opponent is leading by a higher margin than expected, more stuffed forged votes are needed to be injected. That is why you can see sudden spikes of Biden votes.
“Caputo further reported that Nelson said, at the end of the process, ‘Biden’s vote count dropped by 42 in Ware (4,211 to 4,169); Trump rose by 37 (9,865 to 9,903).’”
Pfft. And they still miscounted.
Real news, or Fake news?
I apologize. Posting from iPhone. That general question was intended for all the freedom loving Americans posting on FR.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=emb_title&time_continue=326&v=Zrpw0rI-APU
Garland Favorito: Ware Cty GA Machine Shows Software Programmed to Flip Votes to Biden
https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/11/ware-county-confirmation.jpg
Looks like Carlos Nelson has some explaining to do.
If is a darn lie, about the vote flip, he told it.
The fact they refused to let Garland Favorito testify as a Trump witness is very troubling.
Ware County Election Supervisor Carlos Nelson told me this is false: No one has obtained any machine from his office. There was a human-error tabulation issue discovered during the hand recount, the tallies of which were matched by the just-ended machine recount
ββββββββββββββ. βββ-
Did you read any of that before you posted it?
He is saying the hand count demonstrated the machine count switched votes so they ran the ballots through the machine to confirm the machine count and threw out the hand count.
He's saying the vote count changed after the recount because of a human error - apparently with the initial count.
He's explicitly saying 1) no one impounded any tabulating machine and 2) the machines didn't flip any votes - it was people who screwed up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.