Posted on 09/15/2020 5:02:14 PM PDT by proud American in Canada
What I’m hearing is that the number of cases is turning out to be like a typical flu. And compared to the only other SARS event that we know of, 2002-2003, this one is dramatically less lethal. That one killed 8% of known cases and probably led to some of the panic when this was identified as another SARS.
It’s a real disease and serious for some people. There’s reports of heart damage. Arrhythmia. As well as abnormal clotting. DVTs. Stroke.
Please add me to your Ping List
Tucker 9/16/2020 Steve Bannon.
Please add me to your ping list.
God bless!
There may be a huge placebo influence with this virus.
Color Revolution Playbook
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2018/08/17/color-revolution-playbook-trump-russia/amp/
Tucker’s FB page posts video excerpts from his show every night.
Thanks for the Eisen link; post/pic; thread.
You pointed out that you wouldn’t believe it unless Bannon talked about it. I was pointing out that he has a link on his site about it.
I didn’t write the “Proof” headline, it was there on Steve Bannon’s site.
Thanks for the reference to his videos
Per her research paper:
Final remarks
Many questions remain unanswered about the origin of SARS-CoV-2. Prominent virologists have implicated in a Nature Medicine letter that laboratory escape, while not being entirely ruled out, was unlikely and that no sign of genetic manipulation is present in the SARS-CoV-2 genome4. However, here we show that genetic evidence within the spike gene of SARS-CoV-2 genome (restriction sites flanking the RBM; tandem rare codons used at the inserted furin-cleavage site) does exist and suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 genome should be a product of genetic manipulation. Furthermore,the proven concepts, well-established techniques, and knowledge and expertise are all in place for the convenient creation of this novel corona virus in a short period of time.
Motives aside, the following facts about SARS-CoV-2 are well-supported:
1.If it was a laboratory product, the most critical element in its creation, the backbone/template virus(ZC45/ZXC21), is owned by military research laboratories.
2.The genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 has likely undergone genetic engineering, through which the virus has gained the ability to target humans with enhanced virulence and infectivity.
3.The characteristics and pathogenic effects of SARS-CoV-2 are unprecedented. The virus is highly transmissible, onset-hidden, multi-organ targeting, sequelae-unclear, lethal, and associated with various symptoms and complications.
4.SARS-CoV-2 caused a world-wide pandemic, taking hundreds of thousands of lives and shutting down the global economy. It has a destructive power like no other. Judging from the evidence that we and others have gathered, we believe that finding the origin of SARS-CoV-2 should involve an independent audit of the WIV P4 laboratories and the laboratories of their close collaborators. Such an investigation should have taken place long ago and should not be delayed any further.We also note that in the publication of the chimeric virus SHC015-MA15 in 2015, the attribution of funding of Zhengli Shi by the NIAID was initially left out. It was reinstated in the publication in 2016 in a corrigendum, perhaps afterthe meeting in January 2016 to reinstate NIH funding for gain-of-function research on viruses. This is an unusual scientific behavior, which needs an explanation for.What is not thoroughly described in this report is the various evidence indicating that several corona viruses recently published (RaTG1318, RmYN0230, and several pangolin corona viruses27-29,31) are highly suspicious and likely fraudulent. These fabrications would serve no purpose other than to deceive the scientific community and the general public so that the true identity of SARS-CoV-2is hidden.Although exclusion of details of such evidence does not alter the conclusion of the current report, we do believe that these details would provide additional support for our contention that SARS-CoV-2 is a laboratory-enhanced virus and a product of gain-of-function research. A follow-up report focusing on such additional evidence is now being prepared and will be submitted shortly
I had assumed that you had read the link that you posted.
In which case you would have noted that it’s just a rehash of her original paper at Zero Hedge posted by “Tyler Durden”.
The placebo effect requires that patients receive what they think is a medicine but isn’t. Where or how is that being done?
Yeah, it is a rehash of Tucker appearance material.
But it was on BANNON’S SITE, which you mentioned.
If he is the arbitrator of what is right about this he must consider it pretty important to have it linked on his site.
I consider him one of the best-informed people on China that is out there right now as well.
The placebo effect works both ways. It’s the power of suggestion.
Believing you will die from getting CV19 will increase a person’s chances of dying if they get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.