Posted on 08/13/2020 11:29:44 AM PDT by qaz123
Ridiculous licensing needs to be abolished anyway..
They are drunk with power and have no fear whatsoever of any repercussions. This - unfortunately - is one area where our leftist enemies have us beaten.
That’s my point. They are drunk with power because the people keep giving them drinks. Take that away from them. Have a recall effort. And when they’re bounced, let them go to court to stop it. They only win because the people let them.
When this first started the Sheriff didn’t do anything to the gym owners. It wasn’t until the cops showed up, at the orders of leadership, did something happen to these people.
I saw that. And they’re doing that hoping that they’ll get their day in court and win. Which is awesome.
But at some point, probably tomorrow, they’ll get the Cease & Desist Order. After that they’ll get arrested, if they open the doors again. All of that is going to cost a lot of money and pain.
Somewhere, there’s a cheap and easy method to recall all those council members. Print out the forms at Kinko’s and start going door to door. Oh wait.....The ‘Rona won’t let you go door to door. Isn’t that convenient?
Do it anyway.
It may very well come to that.
NO STATE may convert a RIGHT into a PRIVILEGE and require a LICENSE or FEE for the exercise of that RIGHT!!! Please see MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105, and if a STATE does erroneously do require A LICENSE OR FEE for exercise of the RIGHT, the Citizen may IGNORE THE LICENSE AND OR FEE and exercise the RIGHT WITH TOTAL IMPUNITY!!! Please see SCHUTTLESWORTH vs. BIRMINGHAM 373 U.S. 262. YOU CAN NOT BE PUNISHED FOR THE EXERCISE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!!! Please see MILLER vs. UNITED STATES 230 F.2nd 486. You have a PERFECT DEFENSE TO THE ELEMENT OF WILLFULLNESS if you rely on the advice of Counsel or upon a DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AS A DEFENSE. Please see U.S. vs. BISHOP, 412 U.S. 346. If the Prosecution who bears entirely the proofs beyond a TOTAL REASONABLE DOUBT can NOT prove WILLFUL INTENT TO AVOID AND KNOWN DUTY OR TASK UNDER THE LAW WITH A MORAL CERTAINTY, said Prosecutor does NOT HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH A COURT OF LAW MAY GRANT RELIEF TO HIM/HER, and thereby has NO CASE AT LAW!!!! FACT!!!!! See Michigan Court Rule 2.116 (c) (8) FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED BY THE COURT.
I like ya, bro, but fewer caps and more paragraphs, please. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.