Posted on 05/12/2020 6:29:57 PM PDT by ransomnote
That is exactly how Pelousey describes the wrap up smear. Obviously a dem ploy they all use.
Extra credit when it sticks to the wall like that!
HA! I laughed out loud!
Her biggest mistake was she believed the "Intelligence Community Assessment" (aka: "ICA"; aka "The Obama Dossier") that Russia was interfering in the election, and had taken over at least some significant systems such as the DNC and other RAT IT platforms.
Because of this, she thought the U.S. was virtually under attack and the investigation was warranted.
Yates was catapulted far up the ladder from AUSA to A.G. (for a few weeks) by people ahead of her leaving. She was not in a position in 2016-2017 to call out Brennan, Clapper, Comey et al. as LIARS.
Moreover, she tried to control Comey but was unsuccessful, as he evidently WENT AROUND HER STRAIGHT TO PRESIDENT ZERO (or, more likely, Zero went around her to Comey).
My biggest takeaway from reading the Yates transcript was the IMPORTANCE of the ICA ("Obama Dossier") to this whole plot.
I went straight from Yates to reading the Michael Henry transcript--President of Crowdstrike.
Henry had NUTHIN'. They alleged they "Recognized" some techniques of hacking that they had internally ascribed to the Russian Government. Proof of HACK? Only "Circumstantial", i.e., "How else could the documents have been provided to Wikileaks?
Yet, this pile of trash and lies is now taken as "Gospel" even by many so-called Republicans. IT MAKES ME SICK.
At one point, Henry even used the ICA as part of his "Evidence" of Russian HACK--EVEN THOUGH THE ICA ("Obama Dossier") relied TOTALLY on Crowdstrike!
You can't make this stuff up.
Incidentally, Henry (Crowdstrike) was asked about the theory that someone (i.e., Seth Rich) could have taken the DNC data using a thumbdrive. Henry said "No way," but was TOTALLY UNABLE to JUSTIFY this answer. He said his "Experts" told him so.
The whole Crowdstrike involvement and the subsequent ICA (i.e., Obama Dossier) is one of the BIG LIES of this coup d'etat ... right up there with the Steele dossier.
was it yesterday or today...anyways ...Happy B’day.
how many ?
Maybe they can get Greta on a follow up panel for modifying small block V-8s. She seems like a wizard level knowledge holder...
*****************
Actually they need her expertise on the Iranian and North Korean nuclear programs, as lead scientist. They also need her to head the DNC along with AOC.
cripes...isakoff s\b isikoff
cripes...isakoff s\b isikoff
They also need her to head the DNC along with AOC.
Please make it so, oh, God Almighty. Then we can substitute videos of such for some 3 Stooges reruns.
Rush contradicting himself on that point.. says we dont go after ex presidents, then spends 10 minutes describing MSM going after Trumpster.
Rush doesnt understand the game has changed. This is war, Trump plays it better than the Dems. Before now Dems played hardball politics Republicans were spectators. No longer. Trump understands were one election away from losing our country.
I lost faith in Rush long ago for not taking more of a leadership roll years ago, after Newts revolution Rush was active, since then hes gutless.
He follows Q, he knows how we feel, but belittles us
“I read the Yates transcript rather carefully; and, I think she was Not Guilty of being part of the coup d’etat cabal.”
**********************************************************
I agree. Her transcript was the first I read. I believe she was kept “out of the loop”...useful idiot / placeholder
Catherine Herridge for...something. The only actual journalist in the whole MSM!
Given all we now know, is there ANY question on who ran the Hillary email investigation and cover up?
Barky pulled the strings, play by play. Right down to the Press Conference of exoneration.
OMG, Me, too. LOL
***********************************
I’m sure there are many, many more like us.;-)
I am reading Moyer’s interview now. Yates was next.
Just got done reading Farkas.
Gowdy’s questioning would put anybody into a perjury trap.
I felt like calling in and telling him we would put his actual name on the court documents cause he never legally changed it.
“Is recused” is different than recusing.
We had a decent discussion on this not too long ago.
Unmaskers:
Samantha Power, James Clapper, Kelly Deggnan, John Phillips, John Brennan, Patrick Conlon, Jacob, Lew, Arthur “Danny” McGlynn, Mike Neufeld, Sarah Raskin, Nathan Sheets.
Flynn’s intercepted phone call was leaked to the WaPo prior to Jan 12 when they published their op-ed about it. So, review the dates when people submitted unmasking requests and you’ve got your leaker.
No Capes! Per Edna Mode
Incredibles
Secretary Pompeo
@SecPompeo
Join me in lighting a candle tonight at 8 PM as part of
@NLEOMF’s annual candlelight vigil to honor our fallen law
enforcement members. We remember and honor those who gave
their lives to keep us safe, including members of our
@StateDept family. #UnitedByLight
https://twitter.com/SecPompeo/status/1260626103376502788
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.