[Yosemitest]

Here's one more comment from Mississippi Gov Reeves.

Our Safer at Home order is set to expire on Monday. The United States just reached its highest unemployment rate since the Great Depression. The virus is still a deadly threat. There are major decisions that we have to make going forward. We will talk about all of that today at our 2:30 briefing.

[rxsid]

Is the order to require one to wear a face "mask" or a face "covering?" Masks are hard to find, therefore, such an order would condemn those that can't find a mask to not being able to do the things that people who are fortunate to find them can.
If it's for a face "covering," how effective is a bandana at preventing someone from catching a 0.2 micron virus? /r

What does the order say about requiring fully protective eyewear?
If you dont have protective googles (or similar), and you are properly wearing an n-100 mask , you are only protecting 2/3rd's of the main entrance avenues into your body for viruses.

Do people who are obsessed with wearing a mask to "protect" themselves know that they must also wear protective eyewear as well to come close to achieving their goal?

[trebb]

I'm on the coast and haven't seen or heard of any such edict...a few Walmarts have signs saying masks are recommended but I haven't seen anyplace but on Keesler AFB where everyone entering a facility has to wear one.

From what I understand, the restaurants that open have to have masks on the folks that deal directly with the customers...cashiers/wait staff, etc., but not prep folks.

I'm curious - what raised your question?

[CodeToad]