Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A 64-year-old man accidentally ejected himself from a fighter jet at 2,500 feet
CNN ^ | April 13, 2020 | Rob Picheta

Posted on 04/13/2020 2:35:22 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Telepathic Intruder

“Zut alors, Pierre! You’ll have fun. It’ll be the time your life!”


21 posted on 04/13/2020 3:53:38 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

WEll if you’re going to take the ride take the FULL ride...he did something that hardly anyone else in history has ever done.


22 posted on 04/13/2020 3:54:25 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
If he didnt know which button was the ejection switch, how did he know which gadget to pull
to activate the parachute while soaring in the sky, scared ****less .....that saved himself from a crash?
23 posted on 04/13/2020 3:56:24 PM PDT by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Liz

The seats are designed to automatically deploy the parachute as may times, the pilot would be injured during the ejection.


24 posted on 04/13/2020 3:58:11 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: markoman

Yes


25 posted on 04/13/2020 3:58:43 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: markoman

“Is it common to have separate ejection seats in
a fighter jet?

Marko.”

When I was in ROTC, I had a ride in the back of an F-4. There was a handle in the rear cockpit that when set, would eject the pilot if the WSO ejected. When it was off, the pilot would only eject if he triggered his own seat.


26 posted on 04/13/2020 4:06:19 PM PDT by utahb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Good to know....just in case I do that.


27 posted on 04/13/2020 4:09:03 PM PDT by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
The newest version of the James Bond ejection scene?


28 posted on 04/13/2020 4:13:44 PM PDT by newfreep ("INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - DAVID HOROWITZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I’d like to hear the air-to ground conversation from the pilot: “Oh, that parachute? That’s my passenger taking a joy ride.”


29 posted on 04/13/2020 4:14:30 PM PDT by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

To be fair to the French, the flower of French manhood was destroyed in WW1.
73.3% of their forces were killed or wounded.
England had a 35.8% casualty rate.
USA casualty rate was 8.1%.
Only Russia, 76.3%, and the Austro-Hungarian empire, 90.0%, fared worse than France.

In WW2 Belgium didn’t build it’s part of the defensive line to connect to the Maginot Line. The bunkers they did build were built without rebar. Without a defensive line the Germans could flash through Belgium anywhere they wanted and picked the “impossible” Ardennes to launch their offensive into the rear of the English and French forces.
Once the enemy gets in your rear...oh well.

The French lost approximately 60,000 men defending Dunkirk so the English forces could be evacuated. That resulted in England saving 330,000 men who would continue the fight.
The French knew they weren’t going anywhere. They could have easily just given up. They didn’t.

As for the English, in 1941 the Australians held Tobruk for five months before being relieved.
In 1942 the English surrender Tobruk in five days.

At Singapore 80,000 English, expecting attack from sea, surrendered to 36,000 Japanese attacking by land in eight days.

I used to make fun of the French until I looked at the numbers.
BTW, French politicians suck butt.


30 posted on 04/13/2020 4:35:15 PM PDT by oldvirginian (Oh what fresh hell is this!?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Flying a fighter jet is a deadly serious business.
Whoever authorized this person for this ride, and then allowed him to continue after he expressed fear should be court martialled, as well as the pilot who allowed it and apparently did not give an adequate safety briefing to his passenger.


31 posted on 04/13/2020 4:35:36 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill

It sure speaks to laxity and failure to follow the most basic protocol, doesn’t it? I can’t imagine a pilot accepting a passenger who did not want to go along, advanced age, fast heart rate, and no briefing. How in the world did a group of company people even arrange for such a ride-along?


32 posted on 04/13/2020 4:43:50 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
If that was someone’s idea of a joke, it wasn’t funny.

Rather, I think it was a example of right motive, wrong means, although there was a mixed motive on the part of his friends, which was to see the show.

33 posted on 04/13/2020 7:58:29 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson