Posted on 12/06/2019 9:06:00 AM PST by ransomnote
<< “There is no 10 % rule. “ >>
.....
I’m reminded that supposedly it was ten percent of American settlers who fought and won against the British enforcements for gaining our independence. (The rest were not so disposed against the British taxation and heavy handedness, or otherwise did not engage.)
That “standard” may be real or imagined, but may be at play here.
I’ve continued to marvel at the idea this Ukraine fiasco is perfectly poised to boomerang on the RATs ... the Biden quid pro quo video applies to Ukraine and the whole rat nest is omnipresent.
NOTE: DEMs replay Trump’s candidate speech when he joked about Russia getting HRC e-mails. I forgot what he said right after - but the DEMs just played it again - POTUS said, “I’m sure the PRESS will appreciate that” (meaning releasing HRC e-mails) - and then the DEMs say the “Russians” did exactly that - except nobody - Russians or anybody - released HRC e-mails. It was the DNC + Podesta e-mails that were later released. We’re still waiting to see the HRC e-mails ... and we’re assured WE HAVE IT ALL. TBD ;)
These are posts from a self proclaimed insider posting on 4Chan calling himself Big D**k Anon. He's been right a lot in the past (scary right). Some believe him to be Eric Prince, which would make a lot of sense.
I am watching the circus, and they indeed played that segment. Many of the things the Dem House Counsel are self-contradictory. What they are blaming Trump for are behaviors factually performed by Biden and Hillary. I hope the Republicans pick up an all of the jumbled word salad spewed by Dem Counsel's opening remarks.
The protester was Owen Shroyer from InfoWars.
That is being done by minority counsel Stephen Castor ... I thought he was kinda lame during Schity show ... he’s better this morning but still weaker than I’d like.
#1133 Fresh Fish!
Castor makes a good point - the same POTUS the RATs claim is totally incompetent is also the same person they claim was capable of setting up and succeeding in a massive international conspiracy.
REPs point out that Nadler did *NOT* have the DEM counsel sworn in ... Nadler says that the counsels are not witnesses so he didn’t have to ... says now they’ll become witnesses so now he will have them take an oath. I hope a REP in questioning asks the guy under oath whether his statement was true to get it under oath.
John Solomon @jsolomonReports 24m24 minutes ago If IG report finds, as expected, that FBI misled FISA court during Russia probe, one thing to watch is whether DOJ takes action with FISA court, like withdrawing the applications. https://johnsolomonreports.com/the-10-most-important-revelations-to-expect-from-the-russia-probe-fisa-report/ … 74 replies 1,118 retweets 2,445 likes
Biggs makes a point of order, Nadler is angry, “HE WAS NOT A WITNESS!”
They both face the same #1 enemy, Geo S0r0s... yet, when I say that the cognoscenti label me antisemitic. Clever, uh?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But...but..Soros himself is hugely anti-semitic...
MSM DRAMA PROP.
***When have I ever attacked you?***
Nice way to deflect my criticism of you wasting our time by your ridiculous questions. It’s obvious that you are not asking questions to learn. You are asking them to “prove your superiority” when the questions are not answered to your satisfaction. This is the classic definition of a troll.
Ahhhh - the RATs are trying to get around house rule that members and staff cannot impune POTUS ... they’re trying to obfuscate their lies and coverup. Talk about caught in the act!
There was an autopsy. Or was there?
Doubtful. It was Owen Shroyer from InfoWars.
Trump should have shown Sessions the report and said, I’ll be back in little while and you tell me if she is indictable. Had he said no, he should have dismissed him and gone to the next candidate.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you have read the Q threads much, you don’t need any further explanation from me. But since I don’t know if you have or not, here’s a quickie.
There were many other entities involved in Hitlery’s crimes, and many other crimes besides the email stuff. The Clinton Foundation is huge, involving foriegn governments, and countless crimes.
It takes quite some time to investigate all that. Plus, Sessions had to clean out the DoJ first. Many people were fired. Sessions couldn’t do the humoungous investigation all that requirede with a dirty DoJ, and judges in DC were or still are mainly dirty. So Huber has been doing the investigation with a huge staff. It’s coming to a close. It ain’t just Hitlery and some email stuff.
Your pessimism is unwarranted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.