And it's new too.
Posted on 11/23/2019 10:16:30 AM PST by ransomnote
And it's new too.
I was watching a show on A&E last night, 3 part series on the Trump Family...
I think I have figured out who Our President really is, a fine, upstanding, brilliant man who loves his country and wants to pay back the jerks that tried to take him and his family down...
What better way than to become the POTUS...and little miss Cabbage Fart and the rotten gang are just about to find out what it means to ‘cut his teeth in Manhattan business district’...
The Clintons are ‘carpetbaggers’...Arkansas was so sick of them they couldn't wait to get them out of there, and now have named the Airport: Arkansas Airport...the people in the White House couldn't wait to get them out of there from all the ‘sexual’ whisle blowing and theft they were doing, they were afraid that all the antiques would be gone...
Where else to go, why New York of course, still some mafia there, (Kennedys, Cuomos, Schumers,) what better place to go...poor Manahan having to give his Senate Seat or be killed so the slime could have his Seat...(thinking all this time she was going to be POTUS) but she didn't know or was to pickled brained to understand that Our President, being who he is, had one last mission to perform, and he has out done himself as POTUS...Our Country hasn't been this well off in years, and she's got all those promises to pay back for all that money these foreign countries gave her...oh my, oh my, foreign countries don't forget...
Our President moved his residence to FLA. and New York is going to go belly up without all that tax money...who else is going to be a world known multimillion and pay all those taxes??? FLA. is going to do very well, unless of course Our Former President in 2024 decides to pack up and move to Scotland where his Mom was born...
Very interesting history in these three epics on the Trump Family...Best POTUS we have ever had!!!
I know you got this from another post here at FR. Thanks for including your source, it made it easier for me to find the copyright info.
Watch for next post concerning "fair use".
Media News Groups (where this article is posted)
4. Intellectual Property Rights
All information, data, and content displayed on, transmitted through or used in connection with MediaNews Group, dba Digital First Media, sites, including, but not limited to, news articles, reviews, directories, guides, text, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips, video, html, source and object code, trademarks, logos and the like, as well as its selection and arrangement (together, the “Content”), is owned by Digital First Media and its affiliated companies or the third party credited as the owner of the Content. All Content is provided for informational purposes only and you are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy, completeness, and applicability of all Content and for your use of any Content. You may use the Content online only, and solely for your personal, non-commercial use.
If you operate a web site and wish to link to any of the sites owned and operated by Digital First Media, you may do so provided you agree to cease such link upon request from Digital First Media and that you do not state or imply any sponsorship of your site by Digital First Media (for example, by using our stylized trademark or logo).
No other use is permitted without prior written permission of MediaNews Group, dba Digital First Media,. The permitted use described in this paragraph is contingent on your compliance at all times with the Terms of Use. You may not, for example, republish any portion of the Content on any internet, intranet or extranet site or incorporate the Content in any database, compilation, archive or cache. You may not distribute any Content to others, whether or not for payment or other consideration, and you may not modify, copy, frame, cache, reproduce, sell, publish, transmit, display or otherwise use any portion of the Content. You may not scrape or otherwise copy our Content without written permission. You agree not to decompile, reverse engineer or disassemble any software or other products or processes accessible through the Platform, or insert any code or product or manipulate the Content of MediaNews Group, dba Digital First Media, or the Platform in ser’s experience, and not to use aHnyodmatea mining, data gathering or extraction (https://www.medianewsgroup.com/) In certain cases, you may be able to obtain a license to use individual stories that appear on the Platform or affiliated Platform through online functionality we have specifically designated. For example, email a story to (https://www.medianewsgroup.com/) a friend or purchase a photograph.
MediaNews Group, dba Digital First Media, and its licensors retain all right, title, and interest, including, Adtaxi (http://www.adtaxi.com/) without limitation, all intellectual property rights, proprietary rights, rights of publicity, rights of privacy, and anyandallotherlegalrightsprotectingdata,information
Don’t know what to think. So commander-in-chief doesn’t REALLY mean commander-in-chief?
Trump backs down and says he WON’T stop disciplinary process for SEAL Eddie Gallagher after Navy secretary and head of elite unit threatened to resign as the soldier attacks them and says he has evidence they ‘meddled’ in his case
The White House reportedly informed the Navy that President Donald Trump would not interfere with the review of Eddie Gallagher’s SEAL status on Friday
The green light came the day after Trump tweeted that the Navy ‘will NOT be taking away Warfighter and Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher’s Trident Pin’
I am going through the Serial Brain vids right now. My head hurts, but I think POTUS and others are also talking in code. This is all so exciting.
FAIR USE:
Sorry for the wall of text, but it’s necessary.
(From the Copyright Office..the big dogs :) )
Really quick tip: Post the link of the article, then post a paragraph or two from the article. Be safe, don’t make FR sorry.
More Information on Fair Use
Search Cases
Index last updated September 2019
Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. Section 107 calls for consideration of the following four factors in evaluating a question of fair use:
Purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes: Courts look at how the party claiming fair use is using the copyrighted work, and are more likely to find that nonprofit educational and noncommercial uses are fair. This does not mean, however, that all nonprofit education and noncommercial uses are fair and all commercial uses are not fair; instead, courts will balance the purpose and character of the use against the other factors below. Additionally, “transformative” uses are more likely to be considered fair. Transformative uses are those that add something new, with a further purpose or different character, and do not substitute for the original use of the work.
Nature of the copyrighted work: This factor analyzes the degree to which the work that was used relates to copyright’s purpose of encouraging creative expression. Thus, using a more creative or imaginative work (such as a novel, movie, or song) is less likely to support a claim of a fair use than using a factual work (such as a technical article or news item). In addition, use of an unpublished work is less likely to be considered fair.
Amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole: Under this factor, courts look at both the quantity and quality of the copyrighted material that was used. If the use includes a large portion of the copyrighted work, fair use is less likely to be found; if the use employs only a small amount of copyrighted material, fair use is more likely. That said, some courts have found use of an entire work to be fair under certain circumstances. And in other contexts, using even a small amount of a copyrighted work was determined not to be fair because the selection was an important part—or the “heart”—of the work.
Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: Here, courts review whether, and to what extent, the unlicensed use harms the existing or future market for the copyright owner’s original work. In assessing this factor, courts consider whether the use is hurting the current market for the original work (for example, by displacing sales of the original) and/or whether the use could cause substantial harm if it were to become widespread.
In addition to the above, other factors may also be considered by a court in weighing a fair use question, depending upon the circumstances. Courts evaluate fair use claims on a case-by-case basis, and the outcome of any given case depends on a fact-specific inquiry. This means that there is no formula to ensure that a predetermined percentage or amount of a work—or specific number of words, lines, pages, copies—may be used without permission.
Please note that the Copyright Office is unable to provide specific legal advice to individual members of the public about questions of fair use. See 37 C.F.R. 201.2(a)(3).
Thanks for speaking up, rwfok.
If I had seen your reply before I responded, I would have pinged you with my response:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3796021/posts?page=509#509
In addition to the specific article linked therein, I find her whole site fascinating:
http://jandyongenesis.blogspot.com/
I do consider the Bible to be 100% truthful; however, human interpretations are obviously subject to error. We have to keep studying, and keep on growing spiritually.
The More You Know…
Does President Trump know that the White House says he won’t stop the disciplinary process? I think the only people in that WH that are trustworthy are Trumps and anyone Q told us to trust. Everyone else is suspect. IMHO
thanx for posting the reader
quick & convenient, but still prefer the video decode
Before my step mom went all in liberal, she’d tell me that people in Arkansas knew how corrupt Clinton was. She didn’t like him too much either at the time. So you are exactly right.
I’ve been reading about the two boys on the tracks that were murdered and Clinton, during his time as Gov, (and the Mena Arkansas drug running ring) helped cover it up. They were teens. He would never agree to meet with one of the victim’s mothers! And he helped cover the murders up. Probably nothing new but there is it. When and if all of his and her deeds comes out, I think even an educated public will be very surprised at the depth of filth. Sick, sick people.
Perhaps I’m naïve but there is a God and he knows what’s in your heart. How do these people live with themselves? How can they NOT be falling on their knees begging forgiveness? It amazes me. It absolutely amazes me. Sick, sick people.
Thanks, that answers some of my questions.
*** This thread is THE BIGGEST PUBLIC THREAT TO THE DS, hence we must do it better, cleaner, and with more tenacity than any other site, while protecting our benefactor Jim Rob. ***
kinda...
check here for a long running “Q” show (November 2017). They seem to have the same mindset as JR.
One “Q” thread...nothing off topic\don’t take it anywhere else or else it’s hammer time.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1250823/pg82
FR has a wider audience and does it better - IMHO
Oh, got it. Okay. Hope it causes some sleepless nights.
President Trump was right on the issue, as usual; HOWEVER, there is also a legitimate concern about micromanagement of a huge organization (the military) which has to be balanced.
Navy Secretary Spencer (appointed by Trump) is wobbly, but I am hoping they will finally get this right.
After all, Gallagher was ACQUITTED of the primary charge (murder), and punishing him for the photo appears to be just prosecutorial sour grapes.
You lost me at integrity. I don’t see any of that character trait in DC. LOL. But thank you for the insight. Like I said to another poster, hope this causes some sleepless nights.
No, they aren't. They are simply enforcing the rules that have been on the books for a long time.
This isn't that hard. Put a source link in your post, post an EXCERPT of the article, hit post. Very easy.
Big reminder for all: I DO NOT report these mistake when I see them. I'm simply trying to educate ya'll so we don't have problems. (Seems to me there's another thread that really needs more mod attention...true, they might benefit from my informational posts...but I'm not that nice. Mooooo!)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.