Posted on 10/03/2019 11:06:06 AM PDT by ransomnote
I’m in. *ping*
Are you watching Blacklist? We are on series 6 and it is just fantastic. Some of it is just laugh out loud comedy.
Heard that they have agreed to do a 7th season.
Content?????
Not everyone can/wants to/has time to click on a youtube or any link about which there is no info. KitJ made a very good request the other day. The very short version is “NO LINKS WITHOUT SOME SMIDGEON OF CONTENT, PLEASE!”
(Paraphrasing greatly)
LOL
The lurker traffic around here is dense enough MOD could double the daily post count by just asking for "One ping only" from them/us...
---------------------------------------------------------
LOL!
As for me, I lurk more than post nowadays because at 60+ years old I can't seem to stop posting like an idiot. LOL!
5:5 @potus. Rothschilds involved in finding Biden’s son Via Ukraine deal. @potus mentions “plus,plus” in tweet. Reference back to #qanon post 133. Roths are one side of the triangle. Q uses ++ when referring to Roths.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I took POTUS’ use of ++ to mean “more than $100,000” but forgot Q’s use of ++ after Roths. Could be that or maybe even both meanings. I think you are likely correct, being the Brain that you are.
I miss your posts lately!
Same here, a few times a day.
This post makes me smile.
That’s what makes me not use right/left any more. Tyranny is tyranny, and socialist and communist to me are very similar, just a continuum. Right and left originated, from what I have read, from the French Revolution. (link describes). To me they mean little to nothing any more. Same thing with “conservative” and “liberal”. Dems are not “liberal”, they’re tyrannical maniacs who espouse socialism/communism/globalism”, and the meaning of “conservative” is so diluted and RINO’ed and Bill Kristol’ed that it means nothing to me any more. For years, if I have to describe my political ideology, it’s “constitutionalist”.
So the French thing meant, basically, “right” supported aristocracy and monarchy to one degree or another, and “left” mean mob rule, resulting in the excesses that so entranced the Bolsheviks. The French revolutionaires used the word “communes” but I don’t know what they meant; I’m sure half the posters on this thread (or 9/10) know much more about this than I do.
Today the terms “left wing” and “right wing” are used as symbolic labels for liberals and conservatives, but they were originally coined in reference to the physical seating arrangements of politicians during the French Revolution. The split dates to the summer of 1789, when members of the French National Assembly met to begin drafting a constitution. The delegates were deeply divided over the issue of how much authority King Louis XVI should have, and as the debate raged, the two main factions each staked out territory in the assembly hall. The anti-royalist revolutionaries seated themselves to the presiding officer’s left, while the more conservative, aristocratic supporters of the monarchy gathered to the right. “I tried to sit in different parts of the hall and not to adopt any marked spot, so as to remain more the master of my opinion,” one right-wing baron wrote, “but I was compelled absolutely to abandon the left or else be condemned always to vote alone and thus be subjected to jeers from the galleries.”
Totally agree. Sounds more user-friendly. Fake advertising!
I can’t wait until the NYT fake news and its reporters from hell get what they so richly deserve.
Socializm is communizm without the necessary political power to jam the whole enchilada down your throat.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That’s darn good too! And I like the spelling. And they don’t have the power because they don’t have the guns, or mil on their side.
We shall see.
I miss the, "views" counter that used to be a supplemental part of all threads. Number of replies and view counts were interesting. Of course, my donations are always earmarked with a 'thanks for the Q threads' comment.
Cnador7 and I have been having a little discussion about this on the thread about it, your comment would fit right in and makes sense and was sort of what I was trying to say after this but you said it better:
MANPOWER GUIDANCE FOR ACTIVATION AND DEACTIVATION OF RESERVE COMPONENT (RC) MARINES
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3783773/posts?page=51#51
I miss that too. Also, you could put cursor over screen name (I think that's how it worked) and see how many comments total. Helped weed out trolls sometimes.
Guess what just played on CNN I s**t you not!😂🤣 pic.twitter.com/Z0zqZCLOxj— Karli Bonne’⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@kbq225) October 6, 2019
Discipline—particularly harsh discipline—without sufficient heart-to-heart emotionally bonded CONNECTION will virtually always result in rebellion. & Very understandably so.
Parents will either give kids sufficient quality attention, rearing, mentoring, training—or—they’ll pay in grief, lawyers’ fees etc. the rest of their lives.
I have known maybe 3 families in 7 decades who did not have rebellious teens. Was not any ‘need’ for it. Parents taught their kids lovingly how to succeed in life with honorable values. And, they loosened the reins step by step having taught the kids progressive steps to standing on their own feet making their own successful decisions.
Agreed. Thanks for your kind replies.
Podesta surfaces....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.