It's both a crime and an illness!
Posted on 03/04/2019 11:19:25 AM PST by ransomnote
Thanks.
And the number next to the pb refers to the specific item
Post 101 above
Is the past bread Q referenced
Think of it Like if we said post 119 on a previous thread
FBI official Peter Strzok says he didn't arrange a cocktail party with a federal judge who serves on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, despite telling his mistress in a text message that he would.
Strzok suggested a "cocktail party" with U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras in a July 25, 2016, message to FBI attorney Lisa Page. Days later, on July 31, Strzok opened the FBI's probe of possible Trump campaign collusion with Russia.
Strzok told the Justice Department inspector general's office that his messages regarding the judge dealt with no particular case and that the social gathering didn't happen, according to a report released Thursday on the FBI's Hillary Clinton email investigation.
Has once again I’m wrong. Like the thousandth time.
Has once again I’m wrong. Like the thousandth time.
#2959
Hussein gave the order to start the spy campaign.
It was logged officially 2x.
1x - Domestic.
1x - Foreign.
~~~~~~~
“logged” as in how??
can’t wait to see the proof!!!
That's a good point also. I hope there is a drastic climate change in D.C. by Independence Day! 💣 BOOM!
Anybody have a link to the possible redistricting of AOC’s NY Congressional District? I need to repill some people.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here’s one:
https://theintercept.com/2019/02/09/ocasio-cortez-district-redistricting-2020/
I seriously doubt Obama had any part in planning this. He’s not smart enough.
It does have Valerie Jarrett written all over it though. Obama was just a messenger prob.
They say /pb if their link to a post or picture sends you to a previous bread, or thread, which you will have to load to read, and then you’ll have to go back to where you were if you want to pick up from where you left. It is apparently annoying to go to an old thread from the current one and then have to get back, so as a courtesy, they let you know.
placemarQ
thanks..
thanks
It's both a crime and an illness!
(/pb)
Is there a benefit (think public optics) to allowing
your enemy to open the front door?
"War-like’ Posture Activated?
Thank you for playing.
Q
CASTLE DOCTRINE?
A castle doctrine, also known as a castle law or a defense of habitation law, is a legal doctrine that designates a person's abode or any legally occupied place (for example, a vehicle or home) as a place in which that person has protections and immunities permitting one, in certain circumstances, to use force (up to and including deadly force) to defend oneself against an intruder, free from legal prosecution for the consequences of the force used.[1] The term is most commonly used in the United States, though many other countries[which?] invoke comparable principles in their laws.
A person may have a duty to retreat to avoid violence if one can reasonably do so. Castle doctrines lessen the duty to retreat when an individual is assaulted within one's own home. Deadly force may either be justified, the burdens of production and proof for charges impeded, or an affirmative defense against criminal homicide applicable, in cases "when the actor reasonably fears imminent peril of death or serious bodily harm to him or herself or another".[1] The castle doctrine is not a defined law that can be invoked, but a set of principles which may be incorporated in some form in many jurisdictions. Castle doctrines may not provide civil immunity, such as from wrongful death suits, which have a much lower burden of proof.
Justifiable homicide[2] in self-defense which happens to occur inside one's home is distinct, as a matter of law, from castle doctrine because the mere occurrence of trespassing—and occasionally a subjective requirement of fear—is sufficient to invoke the castle doctrine, the burden of proof of fact is much less challenging than that of justifying a homicide in self-defense. With justifiable homicide in self-defense, one generally must objectively prove to a trier of fact, against all reasonable doubt, the intent in the intruder's mind to commit violence or a felony. It would be a misconception of law to infer that because a state has a justifiable homicide in self-defense provision pertaining to one's domicile, it has a castle doctrine protecting the estate and exonerating any duty whatsoever to retreat therefrom. The doctrine can be misused as a pretext for extrajudicial punishment in private spaces. The use of this legal principle in the United States has been controversial in relation to a number of cases in which it has been invoked, including the deaths of Japanese exchange student Yoshihiro Hattori and Scottish businessman Andrew de Vries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine
Remember, government records may not be classified to hide criminal or embarrassing behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.