Posted on 12/26/2018 1:58:28 AM PST by SunkenCiv
>Yeah, because the Bible is based on astrology. What? Oh. Nevermind.
Critics, meh.
I will show wonders in the heavens and on the earth,
blood and fire and billows of smoke.
The sun will be turned to darkness and the moon to blood
before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord. Joel 2:30,31
>Herod’s Death, Jesus’ Birth and a lunar Eclipse [2018]
This date is based on Josephuss remark in Antiquities 17.6.4 that there was a lunar eclipse shortly before Herod died. This is traditionally ascribed to the eclipse of March 13, 4 B.C.
Unfortunately, this eclipse was visible only very late that night in Judea and was additionally a minor and only partial eclipse.
There were no lunar eclipses visible in Judea thereafter until two occurred in the year 1 B.C. Of these two, the one on December 29, just two days before the change of eras, gets my vote since it was the one most likely to be seen and remembered. That then dates the death of Herod the Great into the first year of the current era, four years after the usual date. [ibid]
That fact that this eclipse (March 13, 4 B.C.) was visible only very late that night in Judea and was additionally a minor and only partial eclipse, is significant.
-Frank
A pity for astrology that those Joel verses don’t mention divination using the stars. Of course there are some verses in Isaiah and Daniel that do mention astrologers, but those verses mock them.
The Magi knew when to look for the birth of the Jewish Messiah not by astrology but because of a prophecy made by a leader of their order, Belteshazzar, 483 years earlier.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.