Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Welcome to our Q thread. 

It's impossible to learn about Trump's successes and 
strategy by following the MSM. If you are interested 
in learning more about 'Q' and what's really going on in our government,
please click the links at the top of the table above
to review articles and videos which describe who/what
Q is about.

Much preparation has gone into the strategy now 
unfolding in D.C. The groundwork has been laid and the path
to justice is almost cleared of barriers. MAGA!

Our prior Q thread is here: 
Q Anon: 09/23/18 Trust Trump's Plan 

 

1 posted on 09/26/2018 9:26:06 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: ransomnote; TEXOKIE; bagster; Wneighbor; little jeremiah; txhurl; Aquamarine

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/09/why-the-brett-kavanaugh-smear.php

Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?

One question I have pondered over the last few weeks is, why are the Democrats so determined to block Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court? Realistically, he is the most moderate nominee they are likely to see from the Trump administration. If his nomination fails, the president will most likely appoint Amy Barrett, who is secure against #MeToo allegations and is both more conservative and younger than Kavanaugh. So what is the point?

To some extent, the Democrats’ bizarre smear campaign against Kavanaugh is explicable on short-term political grounds. The Democrats’ crazed base demands that they #Resist, so resist they will, whether it does any good or not. But I think there is something deeper and more sinister at work.

Brett Kavanaugh enjoys one of the most spotless reputations of anyone in American public life. He has been enthusiastically endorsed by those who have known him all his life–by girls he knew in high school and college, by judges he has served with, by professors and students and Harvard and Yale law schools, by judges who have worked with him, by his judicial clerks–most of whom have been women–by the American Bar Association, by sitting Supreme Court justices. In short, everyone who has ever known or dealt with Brett Kavanaugh endorses him.

I think that Judge Kavanaugh’s pristine reputation is one reason why the Democrats have unleashed against him a smear campaign unparalleled in American history. This is the message they are trying to send: If we can do this to the Boy Scout Brett Kavanaugh, we can do it to anyone. Are you thinking of serving in a Republican administration? Or accepting an appointment to the federal judiciary from a Republican president? Think twice, and then think again.

Because our smear machine will reach back to middle school if necessary. If we can’t find any dirt on you, we will manufacture some. There is no depth to which we will not stoop, and your honesty, integrity and spotless reputation are no match for our control over the media and our determination to dredge up ridiculous allegations against anyone who stands in our way.

Really, the more ridiculous the better. If we can accuse Brett Kavanaugh, one of the most respected lawyers and judges in America, of gang rape, we can accuse anyone of anything! And our insane accusations will dominate the news.

That is the Democratic Party’s message. And we have learned from the Christine Ford fiasco that accusations don’t require corroborating evidence. A single wacky, false allegation will negate decades of hard work on behalf of the American people.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations, or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.


1,897 posted on 09/29/2018 2:21:06 AM PDT by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

We know she’s lying.
It’s the old “the emperor has no clothes.”
They know she’s lying - he never had clothes!!!!!!
It’s the old “the emperor has no clothes”
It’s the old “the emperor has no clothes”
Everyone knows she’s lying - the emperor never had clothes


1,921 posted on 09/29/2018 4:47:54 AM PDT by missthethunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

AMERICA PRAYER VIGIL – September, 29, 2018

1,970 posted on 09/29/2018 7:38:34 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. (Psalm 32:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote; TEXOKIE; bagster; Wneighbor; little jeremiah; txhurl; Aquamarine

https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/index.ssf/2018/09/julie_swetnick_one_of_kavanaug.html

Julie Swetnick, a Kavanaugh accuser, faced misconduct allegations at Portland company

FTA:
The suit alleges Swetnick “engaged in unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct” directed at two male employees during a business lunch, with Webtrends customers present. Swetnick claimed two other employees had sexually harassed her, according to the suit.

—More witnesses to her character for interviews! Lying about sexual behavior!—


1,984 posted on 09/29/2018 7:56:41 AM PDT by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote; TEXOKIE; bagster; Wneighbor; little jeremiah; txhurl; Aquamarine

But not in time for midterms.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90243936/exclusive-tim-berners-lee-tells-us-his-radical-new-plan-to-upend-the-world-wide-web

Tim Berners-Lee tells us his radical new plan to upend the World Wide Web

FTA:
This week, Berners-Lee will launch, Inrupt, a startup that he has been building, in stealth mode, for the past nine months. Backed by Glasswing Ventures, its mission is to turbocharge a broader movement afoot, among developers around the world, to decentralize the web and take back power from the forces that have profited from centralizing it. In other words, it’s game on for Facebook, Google, Amazon. For years now, Berners-Lee and other internet activists have been dreaming of a digital utopia where individuals control their own data and the internet remains free and open. But for Berners-Lee, the time for dreaming is over.

“We have to do it now,” he says, displaying an intensity and urgency that is uncharacteristic for this soft-spoken academic. “It’s a historical moment.” Ever since revelations emerged that Facebook had allowed people’s data to be misused by political operatives, Berners-Lee has felt an imperative to get this digital idyll into the real world. In a post published this weekend, Berners-Lee explains that he is taking a sabbatical from MIT to work full time on Inrupt. The company will be the first major commercial venture built off of Solid, a decentralized web platform he and others at MIT have spent years building.


2,040 posted on 09/29/2018 10:08:02 AM PDT by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Not wanting anyone to mention chris garretts name during testimony—

Are there any research psychologists on fr?

Research psychologist professors on fr?

Research psychologist professors who happen to teach at palo alto university and/or stanford u?

I would be very interested in seeing some of the course syllabi from these courses.

Pehaps the fbi can be of some help after all...

I think the palo alto university and/or stanford university psychology departments teach courses in experimental psychology and specifically in how to monitor and control subjects, complete with assignments involving students choosing subjects from their real life social environments. course syllabi would reveal this. A guess as to why they would offer such training is for psy ops for intelligence and counter intelligence.

I think the reason behind fords out of place supercilious smile is because she may in fact teach some of these psy op courses, and she is getting a mental high off of imaining all her former students and colleagues watching her testimony and observing how she is using all of her psy op skills in deceiving and deflecting the senate committee questioning.


2,472 posted on 09/29/2018 11:36:51 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson