Posted on 09/04/2018 10:08:54 AM PDT by SMGFan
Your statement is quite valid. I stand corrected.
But I still hate the “shaming” terminology/expression.
In contrast, Americans who wished to establish themselves in Texas when it was still part of Mexico had to declare themselves to be Roman Catholics. So religion and tolerance were also distinguishing characteristics of "American Beliefs", and an element of our distinctive respect for honest labor, sometimes referred to as the "Protestant Work Ethic". This is not to say that Catholics don't work hard and respect it. Let's just say in comparison with those parts of this hemisphere colonized by the Catholic powers, this part was given a very different start courtesy of that "Ethic".
You missed “ran for governor of California”
Normally the media called these profiles “where are they now”...
He was probably being groomed
You’re right, thank you.
Also, it turns out, two suicide attempts, and then some other really, really bad stuff.
“In a better place”...?
Yes. Errr....probably yes.
Lets face it - slavery is the opposite of respect for people who work hard.And Christianity in general did not turn against slavery until the colonial era in America was well on the way.
William Wilberforce was the preeminent leader in the antislavery movement worldwide - and he only became an abolitionist in 1787. He eventually succeeded in having a squadron of the Royal Navy assigned to the interdiction of the cross-Atlantic slave trade. Hard as it is to think now, the rest of Protestant Christianity followed the British - and the Catholics were the last to get onboard.
Except for the Christians in the American South, of course - they were uniquely situated to be the last to accept the delegitimization of the institution of slavery. Of course, rich as they were in relative terms in their day, the slaveowners of the South were not all that well off compared to ordinary Americans today. They had no A/C, and thought they had it made if a slave operated a fan for them. The medical care they and their children were afforded would not be worthy of the name today. They had no electricity - meaning that their mansions would not merit a certificate of occupancy today. No electronic communication and entertainment, negligible ability to travel . . .
Slave labor to them was what electricity is to us, pretty much. The comparison I draw is how put out we get when the electric power goes down. Naturally they rationalized their behavior, and objected to abolition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.