Because they’re a bunch of loons who have actively embraced mediocrity.
Next Question.
Liberals, rationalizing.
Rationaliation never means having to say sorry, ever being wrong, ever having to change your behavior or views.
Here’s a politically incorrect thought. Because they have a bunch of women in important positions in the company. And, women in business leadership positions is about 72% of what is wrong with this world. They often make BAD decisions.
Liberals have embraced tiered morality like the Code of Hammurabi and Shariah law in Islam. An individual’s status and worth to society is based on their demographics and belief system.
In Shariah law, a Muslim is worth twice as much as a non-Muslim who pays the dhimmi tax, 3 times one who doesn’t. Men are worth twice as much as a woman. That ranking shows up in everything from weight in court to blood money paid upon your murder.
The social justice hierarchy, the privilege stack, is their attempt to impose such an unfair tiered system - ironically in the name of making things fair.
In the liberal worldview, men and whites have an unfair advantage, so they have to be oppressed to make things fair.
When someone is your moral inferior, whether an untouchable in India, dhimmi in Shariah law or white in liberal identity politics, hating on them, demonizing them as a group and systematically oppressing them isn’t wrong. Those groups are seen as inherently bad, guilty of a kind of original sin, white privilege.
Therefore it is moral, to a liberal, to blame all members of said group and oppress them, discriminating against them in hiring or punishing them more harshly for committing an assault on a moral superior.
Liberals have appropriated blasphemy laws from Islam, too. That to disagree with sacred social justice dogma is equated to a literal attack on all believers. This is the reasoning behind Islam calling for the execution of critics of the faith and those who leave it.
Liberals say they are love, so everyone else can be silenced under hate speech. Challenge them after that declaration of sacred truth, and you’re invalidating their existence. You’re guilty of blasphemy, attacking their sacred souls with your evil words, and fit to be lynched by a mob of liberal bullies empowered by their religious faith in their political dogma.
This is why they generally see no problem tearing apart a liberal who commits a minor transgression. They are protecting the ideology, so the intentions or actual guilt of the person is irrelevant. Burn the accused witch, and no one will dare be one. Or beat up the accused conservative, and no one will dare share contrary evil opinions in public because of that public example.
Liberals have borrowed from the systematic oppression of dhimmi in another way. To protect Muslim believers, you aren’t allowed to be friends with them. You aren’t supposed to intermarry, but if you do, the believer can hate the unbeliever though married to them. And per Islamic law, the unbelievers are to be abused in public, whether called a lesser greeting in the morning to slapped by government officials when paying their taxes. The systemic humiliations are seen as a way to keep the inferior class in line while also giving them an incentive to convert.