Skip to comments.
Ancient Greenland was much warmer than previously thought
ScienceDaily ^
| June 4, 2018
| Northwestern University
Posted on 06/11/2018 4:13:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: SunkenCiv
21
posted on
06/11/2018 5:26:26 PM PDT
by
Pelham
(California, Mexico's socialist colony)
To: SunkenCiv
At last I know...and to think of all the hours I’ve sat around pondering, wondering, what ancient Greenland’s climate was...it’s worried me in to gray hair.
Now, I can rest easy. whew!
/s
22
posted on
06/11/2018 5:31:36 PM PDT
by
FrankR
(If it wasn't for stupid ideas, the left would have no ideas at all.)
To: Islander7
How thick would the Greenland ice cap have to be to melt and raise sea levels 30 feet? (the average thickness is 6,6009,800 ft)
It doesnt add up.
Actually, it does. Using your numbers, the sea level rise would be about 38 feet (assuming an average 8,000 foot thickness for the Greenland ice cap.
23
posted on
06/11/2018 5:41:09 PM PDT
by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: PlateOfShrimp
To: Stosh; All
More like a ring Island.
25
posted on
06/11/2018 5:47:44 PM PDT
by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: TomGuy
“experienced warming in the Arctic due to changes in Earth’s orbit...Try fixing that!”
What, are you denying anthropogenic orbit change? It’s settled science!
26
posted on
06/11/2018 6:02:27 PM PDT
by
dsc
(Our system of government cannot survive one-party control of communications.)
To: txnativegop
27
posted on
06/11/2018 6:22:52 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: bgill; marktwain; PlateOfShrimp; Licensed-To-Carry; Verginius Rufus; aMorePerfectUnion; ...
Thanks for posting, and be sure to check out the links in post #15.
28
posted on
06/11/2018 6:27:47 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: colorado tanker
29
posted on
06/11/2018 6:57:39 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: PlateOfShrimp
First time I have heard the Eemian referred to as the Last Interglacial. Either term can be used.
It's like saying Obama, or the president before Trump.
30
posted on
06/11/2018 7:05:17 PM PDT
by
Alas Babylon!
(MAGAMarchOnWashington.com)
To: Alas Babylon!
31
posted on
06/11/2018 7:05:54 PM PDT
by
Alas Babylon!
(MAGAMarchOnWashington.com)
To: SunkenCiv
Greenland's ice sheet, which covers 80 percent of the Arctic country and holds enough ice to equal 20 feet of global sea level, might respond to human-made global warming. "Northwest Greenland might feel really remote, but what happens to that ice sheet is going to matter to everyone in New York City, Miami and every coastal city around the world," said Yarrow Axford,
Mr.Axford is touched this ocean rise only exist where parameters remain static.
32
posted on
06/11/2018 7:24:14 PM PDT
by
the_daug
To: SunkenCiv
I like to point out that the last refuge for dinosaurs in the world was Alaska. Their age lasted from 252 million to just a mere 66 million years ago.
But this suggests that other Arctic locations might have also been warm enough to support such reptiles.
33
posted on
06/11/2018 7:32:44 PM PDT
by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(Liberals have become moralistic, dogmatic, sententious, self-righteous, pinch-faced prudes.)
To: ozarker
Actually, more than 400 years.
34
posted on
06/11/2018 7:48:15 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: SunkenCiv
experienced warming in the Arctic due to changes in Earth's orbit What causes the Earth's orbit to change? (And then change back?) Not thinking so.
35
posted on
06/11/2018 8:29:01 PM PDT
by
super7man
(Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting)
To: TomGuy; sciencewriter86; super7man
I don't buy the idea in the first place, and yes, I'm aware that the idea is popular. One reason for the popularity is to show how slight and gradual natural changes can be easily outdone by careless selfish humans using too much Aquanet.
36
posted on
06/11/2018 11:03:09 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
37
posted on
06/11/2018 11:06:30 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
There were also dinos in the Antarctic, and the climate there was temperate no longer ago than three million years.
38
posted on
06/11/2018 11:08:52 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: PIF; Stosh; Islander7; marktwain; the_daug
39
posted on
06/11/2018 11:09:32 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: SunkenCiv
But if it is warmer, then more water would be in the atmosphere. Thus sucking up much of the change.
40
posted on
06/11/2018 11:54:55 PM PDT
by
Revolutionary
("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson