Q Anon: (4/26/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 4/26/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[txhurl]

One could deputize US Marshalls at 6/hr.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

I love how his hump would change sides.

"What hump?"

[JockoManning]

Sounds good so far.

[Disestablishmentarian]

That’s from a year ago, LJ.

But still good!

[RitaOK]

Got it. Thanks!

[JockoManning]

Understand. Quite believable.

[STARLIT]

Sorry to not reply back. Don't know why I'm thinking there were around 20 people at the secret meeting. But also the Dallas police were suppose to be involved..if we are to believe they shot another to replace the head on JFK. Then farther..there were eight snipers we are to believe.

And different USSS that switched out right before the motorcade began...because they stopped the motorcade in order to get a better shot..and possibly the doctor doing the plastic surgery on the plane.

Yea gads..I sound crazy!! LOL ..

People involved in editing the TV video after the shooting because Johns head came off because of several snipers were involved.

Now I'm shaking my head. ..moving right along.

[Cboldt]

-- Mueller also didn't have to sign that "Unopposed" order. --

Oops, I see I likely mistook your point here.

If you are referring to the Judge's order to produce exculpatory evidence, that was sua sponte by the judge. If Mueller wants to oppose that order, he has to do so on appeal. He would have to object to it (or it would be best to), of course, in the context of the trial, but seeing as how the order tracks case law, opposing it would be nonsense.

Mueller wasn't given the opportunity to sign it. It was issued to him on the judge's volition.

For many years, the Court has entered a standing order in every criminal case requiring the government to produce any evidence in its possession that is favorable to the defendant and material to either the defendant's guilt or punishment pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. The order is entered regardless of the posture of the case when it is assigned to the Court.

From Docket for US v. Flynn, District Court, District of Columbia, 1:17-cr-00232

[Disestablishmentarian]

I have no doubt Comey will testify against others if it is the best deal for his twisted attempt at self justification.

Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES does that make him a white hat!

[RitaOK]

<< Trump to pull feds out of K-12 education
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3547589/posts >>

IMPOSSIBLE! That would mean we might... might.. have a chance to save our country. There goes the Marxist curriculum and Group practicum. Imagine.

[slag]

Did you see this one:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3650714/posts?page=391#391

[little jeremiah]

Was just copying her comments! :-)

[STARLIT]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPboU7s223w

Igors hump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH97lImrr0Q

The brain Igor stole for the monster

[Defiant]

This whole claim that Flynn had to be arrested in order to provide info subject to an NDA strikes me as a little bit of wishful thinking combined with a failure to think logically. If Flynn were a minion in the bureaucracy, maybe he would fear violating an NDA. But he worked for Trump in the White House. If he wanted information that was subject to an NDA placed on him by whatever agency he formerly worked for, that NDA could be voided with the short stroke of a signature by Trump on an order reading, “Tell me everything, your NDAs are void.”

[little jeremiah]

Thanks, and good point about Comey’s memos not being damning to Trump.

[rolling_stone]

what you said 100%

[rolling_stone]

what you said 100%

[StormFlag]

Amen

[little jeremiah]

Very good point.

[RitaOK]

Putin is an old player, cunning perhaps, but people look around. Maybe he has. He gets Trump. Trump has taken flak for him. He sees that. Trump gets Putin.

Mostly they recognize each other. They are MEN.

Old school MEN, and unapologetic. No flouride in their water?