Posted on 04/24/2018 10:12:22 AM PDT by Morgana
NO there is NO comparison. Teri’s husband made the decision not the state. Alfie’s loved ones have NO say in this state sponsored murder of an innocent infant.
Your memory is weak.
Teri’s ‘husband’ filed lawsuits saying “Kill her”; her parents said “Give her to us, we’ll take care of her”.
The judge in the case said “Starve her”.
And starved she was, by imperial decree of another black-robed tyrant.
Terris list ping
Pro life ping
Excuse me, but as the closest relative to Teri, Michael had every right to make that decision. This situation with Alfie and Charlie has the state making the decision without input from anyone who loves him. Can you see the difference now, or shall I type slower so that you can keep up?
Nobody has a right to have someone starved to death.
Do that to a dog and you go to prison.
You apparently love death as much as Michael Schiavo, Judge Greer, and the NHS.
“You apparently love death as much as Michael Schiavo, Judge Greer, and the NHS.”
How silly, nothing left so accuse me of “loving death?” Yawn.
No where did I say that I agreed with Michael, I just said he had the right to make that decision.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.