Posted on 03/20/2018 9:27:44 PM PDT by ransomnote
Looks like a great work. I just don’t have a lot of motivation to get up to speed on it, figuring it out. Much appreciate whatever conclusions you come up with via your grid.
"Mueller's actions while in Boston as a criminal prosecutor raised questions about his role in one of the FBI's most controversial cases involving the use of a confidential informant". . . 1986.
Questions Still Surround Robert Mueller’s Boston Past
In Boston, Mueller was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney’s Office and then became the Acting U.S. Attorney from 1986 through 1987. It was Mueller’s actions during that time that raised questions about his role in one of the FBI’s most controversial cases involving the FBI’s use of a confidential informant that led to the convictions of four innocent men, who were sentenced to death for murders they did not commit. Local law enforcement officials, the media, and some colleagues criticized Mueller and the FBI for what they believed was the bureau’s role in covering up for the FBI’s longtime dealings with mobster and informant James “Whitey” Bulger.
Bulger was a kingpin and a confidential informant for the FBI from the 1970s in the bureau’s efforts to take down the Italian mafia in Boston. But Bulger’s relationship with his FBI handler Special Agent John Connolly became toxic. It was later discovered that Connolly went out of his way to protect Bulger and aided the crime boss against investigations being conducted by the Boston PD and the Massachusetts State Police. According to reports at the time, Connolly would inform Bulger of wiretaps and surveillance being conducted by law enforcement.
“As I have mentioned before, under Mueller’s watch in Boston, the second most corrupt relationship between an FBI agent (John Connolly, now in prison for murder-related charges) and his information (Whitey Bulger) unfolded,” said Schoen. “Mueller was neck deep in it and has never answered the questions that the media asked rhetorically, but that should have been asked by a grand jury of Congressional Committee. Even such dubious sources as the NY Times, Boston Globe, and Huffington Post have demanded answers. Many have suggested he should never have been FBI Director.”
Mueller is just a Boy Scout . . . beholden to the master!
Thanks for the explanation.
Our war has to be against the media. Destroy them and we might have a Democracy or at least a Republic as our forefathers designed. Make it Rain!
That sure needs to be a very high priority, alright. Indeed.
Those who see and understand the depth of the corruption can never seem to get any traction. We raise our kids to do right and that seems to be the best we can do.
I am convinced attacking the MSM and destroying them as we know it is part of Q agenda. But again, not making any traction. Exposing the media seems to fall on deaf ears.
Those who see and understand the depth of the corruption can never seem to get any traction. We raise our kids to do right and that seems to be the best we can do.
I am convinced attacking the MSM and destroying them as we know it is part of Q agenda. But again, not making any traction. Exposing the media seems to fall on deaf ears.
True; the media is now controlled by billionaires... About all we can do is ignore the (bad) media - and PRAY!
MZ.
RT.
Big meeting.
Cell phones left at door.
+8
5 political 1 former intel dir
Mask & Spin
IDEN friendly ‘insiders’
MSM support +talking points
Shift narrative
FAIL
We hear you.
<***>
Q
Well this is in part what came from that meeting
Niiiiiiiice heh?
At least there is a little pushback . . .
Somehow, the masses has to rise and put this crap down once and for all.
Bkmk
Placemark
I shouldn’t be so quick to judge people like Tillerson. I shall be more careful.
Am I the only one that thinks the comedy central skit was great? If I need to explain why you might be missing it. It is about a guy that can't eat the red pill
Timeline shows how insiders sell access and manipulate politicians. Rich with data, pdf files, youtube documentary. A deep rabbit hole. May have posted earlier as I recognize some documents, specially those concerning SES employees. Very informative
620 page pdf file heavy in graphics will be slow to open.
Later, thanks
True. Students paying out of state tuition are no longer allowed to use ID to vote in Indiana. Effective 2016 election. Obama won state in 2012. Lost in 2016 BIGLY
-- saywhatagain: That was why Sessions opened up a parallel investigations --
At least that's how the relationship is phrased. It may be that OIG Horowitz and a Sessions-appointed prosecutor are working as a team, with Horowitz doing the investigation and the prosecutor preparing the criminal cases. This way, the legal action is ready to commence the day the report is made public.
I don't see a parallel investigation, that would be inefficient and wasteful.
Another benefit of adding a prosecutor is that a prosecutor (inside -or- SC) may expand investigation to places that are out of Horowitz's scope - such as State Department.
I've speculated that a Special Counsel has been appointed without notice to Congress or the public. This practice is spelled out in DOJ regulations. This would be similar to naming an inside prosecutor, only putting the formal bringing of charges "slightly outside" of the DOJ (using 28 CFR 600 SC regulations). The ready-to-roll timing and scope expansion effects would be the same as with an inside prosecutor.
Later
Want to speculate who those six people were?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.