Vandals use hammer to smash 115-million-year-old dinosaur footprint at Australian national park

The Telgraph ^ | 12/20/17 | Jonathan Pearlman

[editor-surveyor]

.
Obviously the confused paleontologist won’t know the difference, and he’ll just make up a cute story about it and get a hefty federal grant to tide him over for a few months..

[editor-surveyor]

.
Soros funded no doubt!
.

[sparklite2]

[Salvey]

Not muzzies; rather liberals and BLM claiming that the dinosaurs were racist.

[Salamander]

I don’t go up there unless I absolutely have to....it’s creepy.

Everyone who has ever lived here left behind bits of their lives.

From 18th spectacles, old fountain pens, deadly looking ‘remedy’ bottles, a Nazi belt buckle, to a massive collection of “The Watchtower”, it’s freaky up there.

The little gypsy lizards can have the place to themselves.

:)

[Simon Green]

From 18th spectacles, old fountain pens, deadly looking ‘remedy’ bottles, a Nazi belt buckle, to a massive collection of “The Watchtower”, it’s freaky up there.

Much of that would sell for decent money on Ebay.

I'll be happy to take it off your hands....

:-)

[WayneS]

Do you know why they are smaller now than they were a few thousand years ago?

[gdani]

I guess you can away with crap like that against Christians

I'm sure you know not all Christians subscribe to Young Earth Creation nonsense.

[WayneS]

I thought it was funny.

[Chainmail]

Yes, but most actual Christians don’t post blasphemous images either.

[Chainmail]

Your problem. It isn’t funny unless you’re a Democrat.

[WayneS]

Can you please explain how that image is blasphemous?

[Chainmail]

Haven’t been to a church for a while, have you?

[Bob434]

[[Given that the Solar System is over 4 billion years old, that seems....unlikely. ]]

It’s 4 billion now? A couple months ago it was 6 billion, a year ago it was 2 billion, tomorrow it will be 5 billion- seems that someone’s ‘billionometer’ is off by, well, billions of years- I can see discrepancies of maybe a few years, and still think the measuring methods are accurate, but by billions? What’s a few billion between friends?

[WayneS]

Never mind.

And please ignore my last post to you as well. I have no interest in hearing/reading anything you have to say/write.

Have a nice day.

[Mears]

I thought it was funny also-——lighten up.

.

[FatherofFive]

The only ice age there ever was came from the hot oceans of the Genesis flood, and was already melting 4000 years ago.

Can you send a link for that? Why do believe that is true?

[Simon Green]

It’s 4 billion now? A couple months ago it was 6 billion, a year ago it was 2 billion, tomorrow it will be 5 billion- seems that someone’s ‘billionometer’ is off by, well, billions of years- I can see discrepancies of maybe a few years, and still think the measuring methods are accurate, but by billions?

I simply said that it was over 4 billion years. As for the Earth itself, it's currently dated to approximately 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years. An age of roughly 4.5 billion years has actually been accepted since the 1950's.

Science refines results over time. That's the way it works.

[Bob434]

lol- yeah, works so well they keep adjusting back and forth by billions- I see some new figure has it at 13.8 billion- The whole point is that it’s just opinion- off by billions- depending on who you ask- not very accurate- ‘refining’ by a few billion isn’t exactly science- it’s conjecture based on opinion that ignores or dismisses counter evidence-

[Simon Green]

lol- yeah, works so well they keep adjusting back and forth by billions- I see some new figure has it at 13.8 billion

You seem to be confusing the age of the Earth (roughly 4.5 billion years) with the age of the universe (roughly 13.8 billion years). They're not the same thing.