Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Please make the tax cuts retro-active to January 1, 2017--Discussion Thread
11/15/2017 | nikos1121

Posted on 11/15/2017 6:19:07 AM PST by nikos1121

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2017 6:19:07 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY; Abbeville Conservative; Abby4116; acoulterfan; Airwinger; Albion Wilde; Aleya2Fairlie; ...

Please weigh in with your opinion.


2 posted on 11/15/2017 6:20:14 AM PST by nikos1121 (Tax cuts should be retro-active to January 1, 2017!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

"If you think this is going to end well with the lying GOP,
you have not been paying attention."

3 posted on 11/15/2017 6:22:27 AM PST by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
I would love for the tax cut to be effective 1/1/2017 as we retired Jan 2017 and paid off our mortgage so we no longer have that interest deduction.

But if it's effective 1/1/2018 I understand that the withholding from paychecks will reflect the tax cut so that income earners will be bringing home more in their paychecks right off the bat.

4 posted on 11/15/2017 6:24:21 AM PST by noexcuses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Tax increases would also be retro.

If you are getting tax cut you can adjust your withholding right away.

5 posted on 11/15/2017 6:25:55 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Yes. This ought to be part of the tax reform legislation. Taxpayers need their money more than the profligate government does.


6 posted on 11/15/2017 6:27:33 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Just why would I want my tax increase to be retroactive? As if I am not getting raped enough by the federal government. I hope these bills die.


7 posted on 11/15/2017 6:29:40 AM PST by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

YES!!!!


8 posted on 11/15/2017 6:43:21 AM PST by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

How about this:

Definitely make the new rates retroactive as of Jan. 1, 2017,

BUT:

Also give us taxpayers the option of choosing to file under the old law. That way, nobody’s tax for 2017 would necessarily increase. If you were happy with the old rates, you could keep paying them for 2017.

(I would also recommend retaining the same option for 2018. But getting it only for 2017 would be good enough!)


9 posted on 11/15/2017 6:47:01 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

While I personally would benefit materially from making the changes retroactive to January 1, 2017, many would see retroactive increases; hardly something I could advocate.

I will be very surprised, however, to see anything material actually pass this year to change the tax laws for individuals... Too much chaos has been sown over the past 12 years... Gridlock seems more likely, plus the holdout RINO’s will be able to claim that President Trump is to blame for any failed agendas, so failure to pass something will seem to them like success for Trump, their enemy.


10 posted on 11/15/2017 6:47:37 AM PST by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustTheTruth

... like success AGAINST Trump, their enemy ...


11 posted on 11/15/2017 6:48:31 AM PST by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Bubba’s tax increase was retroactive to the beginning of the previous year, so why not?


12 posted on 11/15/2017 6:51:19 AM PST by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Yup!


13 posted on 11/15/2017 7:01:57 AM PST by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist

Me too. This bill would most likely be a tax increase for us too. I also want it to die. True tax reform cuts spending, otherwise it’s just wealth redistribution.


14 posted on 11/15/2017 7:07:52 AM PST by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

What tax cut? The do nothing congress is engaging in more kabuki IMHO.


15 posted on 11/15/2017 7:27:31 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

This isn’t the way it works. See, in the Bill Clinton era, tax INCREASES were made retroactive back to January. The government doesn’t EVER want to have less money to play with. So, no, our savings won’t be made retroactive. Of course not. Government is all-important, you see. Peons? Not important. Calibrated now?


16 posted on 11/15/2017 7:33:12 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (Trump won; we got Gorsuch and a bit of MAGA. Likely have a civil war before we get more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Since I am looking at a tax increase, I hope it is not retroactive.

Unless they restore the personal exemptions, many will find their taxes increase rather than decrease. I would think the democrats would prefer to have it for 2017 since it will cost the republicans seats after the changes.

17 posted on 11/15/2017 7:33:49 AM PST by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

No. My taxes are going to go up as it is. Why would I want to add another year to the pain?


18 posted on 11/15/2017 7:34:33 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skooz

It’s different for dems. They are divided into two basic categories. The ruling elite dems say they want to pay higher taxes, so they don’t dare complain about them, and the useful idiots, the low information voters don’t pay any taxes anyway, so they really don’t care.


19 posted on 11/15/2017 7:39:02 AM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

With what they have now, I will see a nice tax savings as well as everyone I’ve talked to in my family. My neighbor said he plugged in his numbers and will save a couple of grand.
So I’d like to see it retroactive but I’d be happy if the thing just PASSES. I’m expecting McNasty et al to pull the Lucy football on it.


20 posted on 11/15/2017 7:43:27 AM PST by weston (SO HERE'S THE STORY: As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson