Posted on 11/08/2017 7:52:56 AM PST by George Rand
You didn’t ask a question.
You advanced an attack and an insult disguised as a question.
Sort of like if I asked you if you were a media-bias denier.
I do not deny that all media are biased....some more so than others
No tell us if you are a 9/11 truther
No
Sort of like a swear jar, lol!
“No tell us if you are a 9/11 truther”
Tell us if you are a pedophile.
Totally agree with your tagline.
You really have been using too much. Put down the pipe already
Your avoidance tells me all I need to know
As to your snark...no I am not a pedophile
“As to your snark...no I am not a pedophile”
It is “snark” no more than your “question” whether or not I am a 9/11 truther. I have as much reason to think you are a pedophile as you do to think I am a 9/11 truther, and am as justified in asking the question.
The other day I found out that one of the other parents at the ice rink is a brain-dead, hillary-voting leftard piece of shit. After I told her that yes, Felonia von Pantsuit was a murderer many times over, she asked me if I believed in flying saucers. I’m sure she thought she was very clever, just as you do.
As of right now, I have you marked down as a leftard troll.
And just for any third parties who might mistakenly think you credible, I am not, nor ever have been, a 9/11 truther.
Your presumption that I am a leftie is beyond offensive
I don’t agree with one of your conspiracy theories. So what? That does not make me a laftist
There’s a mass shooting every week or so now. They are always going to be close to something.
But a shooting in Texas impacting an election in Virginia seems like a reach at best.
“I don’t agree with one of your conspiracy theories. So what? That does not make me a laftist”
You’ve been acting like one. Instead of reasoning against my position, you have employed Alinsky’s tactics of isolation and ridicule. You impugned my sanity and intelligence with your “9/11 truther” nonsense, with absolutely no grounds. Instead of owning up to the “snark,” as you put it, you continued to badger me to submit to your faux questioning.
You refer to “one of” my conspiracy theories as though it were established that I entertain more than one. That is a dishonest attempt to discredit me as a crackpot, without having offered anything in support of your slur.
Most leftlike of all, perhaps, you seem to think that the mere use of the term “conspiracy theory” should discredit its object and the person advancing it.
That’s not how conservatives act. Leftists act like that.
People do conspire. The media conspired to deceive the American People in the service of the USSR, and did so with substantial success for decades. The Rosenbergs conspired to deliver nuclear capability to the Soviets. Dan Rather conspired to influence a recent election with false documents. Even now, the forces of evil conspire to reverse the election of the first good man to occupy the White House since Ronaldus Magnus.
You say you don’t see how odd, how inexplicable this tsunami of mass murders really is. The people who do see how very convenient these attacks are, are not whacked out “conspiracy theorists;” they are just ahead of you. Way ahead.
“But a shooting in Texas impacting an election in Virginia seems like a reach at best.”
Gun control is a national issue. Gun grabbers in Virginia can be prodded to the polls by a horrible crime such as the one in Texas.
The larger goal is to reduce us under tyranny, and that goal is served by these crimes, whether they have much effect on state elections or not.
Conspiracy`s are about the most common thing in business or politics or for that matter its a part of growing up, they are just hard to prove.
I can not understand why it would make some people paranoid just to hear the word.
Apparently you have your self all wound up
Your desire to be correct inhibits discussion
After Joe McCarthy was discredited (by a conspiracy) the fellow travelers in the media set out to make anti-communism a joke.
Anyone who doubted that the Soviets had our best interests at heart was ridiculed for seeing “a communist hiding under every bed.” Anti-anti-communism was required of all. A comedian could get a laugh just by uttering the words, “communist plot.”
This intellectual climate allowed the Soviets to wreak havoc with us, virtually without let or hindrance from any quarter.
They have done the same with “conspiracy theory.” Media bias was just a “conspiracy theory,” you see. J. Edgar Hoover’s list of Soviet agents within our government was another.
All that was needed to discredit an accusation was for the useful-idiot media choir to strike up a rousing chorus of “Oh, that’s just a conspiracy theory.”
When a person recovers from leftism, it doesn’t usually happen in an instant. It can actually take decades. A person can go through a stage of being economically conservative but socially liberal, for instance, and this conditioned response to the notion of “conspiracy theory” can linger to cloud one’s thinking for far too long.
You are right on and most folks want to think every thing is Ok, we don`t dare upset their little safety havens.
Paranoia must surely bump up against common sense, even if it’s just in passing.
Paranoia must surely bump up against common sense,
I don`t have any idea if the said story has anything to do with conspiracy or not but conspiracy is the name of the game and always has been, even in such things as small business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.