Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Modern Architecture SUCKS
You Tube ^ | 30 June 2017 | Paul Joseph Watson

Posted on 06/30/2017 1:53:12 PM PDT by Lorianne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: Neidermeyer

As stated in the video, despair and suppression (ever see the Asians especially Chinese on their way to work?) is the goal. Realism and beauty point to the Creator and is forbidden.

There is a small group of artists who are still painting realistically and they are wonderful. Also, takes much much more time to paint realistically. One artist I know takes months on one painting. An artist I saw in Chicago in the 80’s spent a year on one painting.


61 posted on 06/30/2017 6:19:40 PM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Communist takeover plan #15

Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

http://commieblaster.com/news/communist-takeover-plan.html


62 posted on 06/30/2017 6:32:17 PM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: x
Architects have traditionally held tightly to a white patriarchical heterosupremicist view of concepts like "up" and "down." Post-post-post modernists are breaking free from such constricted thinking and millennia-old norms...kind of like letting men into little girls rooms...


63 posted on 06/30/2017 6:44:06 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
It is not an excuse, other than to note that more and more contemporary structures are either built for or under sponsorship of one or another body of government. It goes way beyond city halls, courthouses and jails, too.

Corporations have at least some sense of balance when they contract with an architect for a headquarters building or a regional office. They must consider how a new building is going to enhance their product marketing, productivity, employee morale, public perception, etc. But above all, the building's purpose, cost and life expectancy have to fit with the corporation's long-term projections for growth and profitability.

No such constraints would likely apply for a federal building, a VA hospital, or a federal courthouse. (I was looking for a sketch of a proposed mint from the 1980s but couldn't find it. Talk about form before function!)

64 posted on 06/30/2017 7:17:23 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

The Eiffel Tower is an eyesore.


65 posted on 06/30/2017 8:48:30 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!

“Wow. I don’t mean to be insulting, but to me those are hideous,”

Of course they are. They don’t consist of columns, brick, and arches, and the rudimentary stuff most people that complain about architecture today think are required for a building to be “good”.


66 posted on 06/30/2017 8:52:16 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

“The Eiffel Tower is an eyesore.”

Yeah, ok.

Some people on the right just strive to prove that the stereotypes are true.


67 posted on 06/30/2017 8:54:23 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

What stereotype?


68 posted on 06/30/2017 8:59:46 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I’m going to be a contrarian and disagree. I think the current Mustang is the best looking Mustang since the 1969 model. I also think the current Corvette is a home run. It totally eclipses the last two body styles. The current Chevy trucks are a high point as well, with styling that’s at least as good as the fantastic looking late ‘70s and ‘80s models. The current BMWs look great, Audis look great, Range Rovers look great. Jeeps look amazing these days. I look around and see beautiful designs all the time. Which is pretty amazing given all the constraints the stylists have to work within.


69 posted on 06/30/2017 9:28:29 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

I have noticed somethimg interesting. No one wants to drive a car that looks like a Model T, or fly in a biplane, or dress like it’s 1885. The same people will mock modern architectural design, and want to live in a house that mimics old architecture, and is filled with decor that copies motifs from hundreds of years ago.


70 posted on 07/01/2017 5:27:25 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Where’s that face palm meme when you need it!


71 posted on 07/01/2017 5:31:55 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Ok then that’s about it. Very reasonable, I think.


72 posted on 07/01/2017 7:53:25 AM PDT by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
I’m going to be a contrarian and disagree. I think the current Mustang is the best looking Mustang since the 1969 model.

I agree that at least the exteriors of some of the contemporary classic U.S. marques are excellent, and the recent (not quite current Mustang) is a great example.

Here's my test:

If someone went into suspended animation in 1953 (Chrysler 300), 1965 (Ford Mustang), or 1970 (Dodge Charger, Challenger, Dart), and woke up and saw the current lineups, would he view these as future versions of what he might expect said models to look like in 2017?

Mustang, 300 (hemi version only), Charger, Challenger, yes.

Dart ... FAIL!
The invasion of huge central consoles in all of these vehicles ruins them for me. Hence I'm sticking with our split bench 1994 Buick Roadmaster and 1999 Buick Century.
73 posted on 07/01/2017 10:04:27 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
They don’t consist of columns, brick, and arches, and the rudimentary stuff most people that complain about architecture today think are required for a building to be “good”.

I think you're taking a condescending and elitist position. Which of course is your right. But it's a little surprising to see this kind of attitude expressed on FR.

74 posted on 07/02/2017 4:23:56 PM PDT by shhrubbery! (NIH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

What would Howard Roark think?


75 posted on 07/02/2017 4:34:22 PM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!

Not at all.

This is something I study, and have for years.

This topic is a perennial one, where the everything done after year X sucks” has been done to death, and consists of no argument that rises above cliches and a standard that would retard architectural advancement to the Georgian period or maybe something from mid-Victorian times.

The biggest problem is that people see architecture is a lineal thing. That Neo-Gothic came from Noe-Classical and that came from Baroque. That in the end, there was some nefarious plot by degenerate architects c. 1918 to abandon the “true” architecture for Art Deco, Bauhaus, Futurism, Brutalism, Post-Modernism, and so on. The reality is that all of these were different schools, that rose and fell, and that created great structures as well as complete trash. It simply isn’t an all or nothing.


76 posted on 07/02/2017 6:27:09 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson