Posted on 04/10/2017 11:39:18 AM PDT by C19fan
An interesting point that echoes my thought. Some years back we visited the Valley of Fire, a Nevada State Park that had some petroglyphs "dating back more than 2,000 years", according to one brochure.
The museum had a lot of artifacts, including a drawing of an Indian woman grinding corn. From the way she dressed, I thought, "Oh, about 100-200 years ago." It turned out to be 2,000 years ago, an artist's conception, based upon the tools found there.
While there can be some slack in someone's "conception", it hit me that in 2,000 years, these people had not advanced, as I had seen photos of similar operations taken in the mid-1800s and couldn't tell the difference.
This was a far cry from similar then-and-now pics of Anglo Saxon development. In one area, I got a kick out of the generational fashion changes of Westerners compared to the sameo-sameo buckskins the Indians wore year in and year out.
Note: this topic is from . Thanks C19fan.
12000bc is stamped right on the coins, dummy.
DOH! Oh, wait. Did I ask how they knew? Maybe it was the weeks old K-Mart ads they found. :-)
‘What this is doing is just changing our idea of the way in which North America was first peopled.’
Between lack of DNA for many so called Native American tribes, discoveries like this are changing so called histories of so called Native Americans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.