Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elon Musk’s SpaceX to launch 4,000 satellites for global Internet coverage
Washington Journal ^ | 11/17/16 | Daniel Navas

Posted on 11/21/2016 2:45:10 AM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: wastoute

Teledesic


21 posted on 11/21/2016 4:15:47 AM PST by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

It would be a real tragedy if Musk were to increase access, bring competition , and lower the costs of broadband services the same as he’s done for launch services.


22 posted on 11/21/2016 4:17:15 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

These satellites will be well above low earth orbit operations.


23 posted on 11/21/2016 4:18:53 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: boycott

I hope Trump exposes such things, and those similar, to Americans who have been exploited and paid for said crap


24 posted on 11/21/2016 4:27:01 AM PST by um1990 (Reaganut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Yeah, we need to prevent progress at all cost!


25 posted on 11/21/2016 4:36:48 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Time for a new party for We the People, to restore a two-party system!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

4000+ satellites doesn’t sound like geostationary if thats what your getting at. Sounds more like a cloud of fast-moving LEO satellites.


26 posted on 11/21/2016 5:04:29 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

4000+ satellites doesn’t sound like geostationary if thats what your getting at. Sounds more like a cloud of fast-moving LEO satellites.

...

No, not geostationary. Another article said around 700 miles. That’s well above the ISS, but low enough to reduce latency compared to geostationary.


27 posted on 11/21/2016 5:19:57 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Latency will suck bigly. How does 500-600 msec (on a good day) sound? 800 - 1200 msec or worse is more like what you’ll get.


28 posted on 11/21/2016 5:34:26 AM PST by Noumenon (We owe them nothing: not respect, not loyalty, not obedience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Are you thinking of the sat phone business called Iridium?

After launching its constellation of satellites, they went bankrupt. Another company bought up the assets for pennies on the dollar.


29 posted on 11/21/2016 5:41:20 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I recall seeing some graphics of all the “space junk” filling Earth’s orbit.

Before adding to the clutter, maybe he could clean that up.


30 posted on 11/21/2016 5:58:23 AM PST by airborne (I don't always scream at the TV but when I do it's hockey playoffs season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Iridium.
The technology wasn’t quite “there”, grounds units were bulky, service was very expensive (think $3/minute), and was quickly overrun by competing technology.

SpaceX has their own inexpensive launch service, technology costs have plummeted, and wired connectivity is being abandoned for wireless.


31 posted on 11/21/2016 6:07:36 AM PST by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

As I recall, the “Another company” was a Saudi.


32 posted on 11/21/2016 6:21:36 AM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Probably from his usual source: taxpayer-money “grants”. Hold on to your wallet1


33 posted on 11/21/2016 6:39:01 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

“Near earth space will be awfully crowded.”

To wrap my mind around it on a much, much smaller scale, I can visualize 4,425 ‘red’ inner-tubes floating in the ocean. Wonder what the odds of 1,400 ‘blue’ inner-tubes (randomly) hitting a red one are? Add in another variable of weighing the tubes to submerge to different depths and the odds grow even more.


34 posted on 11/21/2016 6:57:31 AM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

With so much stuff in orbit, we’ll have 40% less sunlight and a new ice age! < /enviro-weenie meltdown >


35 posted on 11/21/2016 7:26:53 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Thanks for the explanation. I had an image of a redux of the Iridium constellation as others have noted.


36 posted on 11/21/2016 8:14:34 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

I remember a company called GlobeTel Communications Corp which had a platform called Stratellite. Interesting idea at the time but management and funding problems led to bankruptcy.


37 posted on 11/21/2016 8:43:27 AM PST by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

That was it. Iridium. How many millions did Rat politicians make on this and Global Crossing. Interesting they all abandoned ship just before both companies went belly up. Almost like they “knew” something.


38 posted on 11/21/2016 8:48:40 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
All satellites will be painted green. So yes, it falls in the 'green initiative' category of welfare handouts.

Trump needs to halt all 'green' welfare handouts/subsidies.

39 posted on 11/21/2016 8:53:24 AM PST by deadrock (I is someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I would say this is stupid. You do not need that many satellites. Ground stations could do this at a fraction of the cost.

First things first. The people need decent food and water and medicine in most of the world before internet. I suspect this is just another scam to get taxpayer money.


40 posted on 11/21/2016 10:50:41 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson